Richard Jaimes v. Geico General Insurance Company

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 13-11614
Non-Argument Calendar
_____________
D. C. Docket No. 9:10-cv-80769-KAM
RICHARD JAIMES,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
a corporation,
Defendant-Appellant.
______________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
______________
(October 29, 2013)
Before DUBINA, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-11614 Date Filed: 10/29/2013 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
This appeal involves attorneys’ fees. Defendant-Appellant GEICO General
Insurance Company’s (“GEICO”) sole argument on appeal is that if the final
judgment entered by the district court is vacated as requested by GEICO in appeal
No. 124427, the award of attorneys’ fees to Appellee Richard Jaimes (“Jaimes”)
should likewise be vacated. Because our court has affirmed the final judgment in
appeal No. 12-14427, see Jaimes v. GEICO General Insurance Co., Nos. 12-14427
& 13-10847 (11th Cir. Aug. 15, 2013), we also affirm the district court’s order
awarding attorneys’ fees to Jaimes in the present appeal (No. 13-11614).
AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-11614 Date Filed: 10/29/2013 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --