The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-10319•USA v. Warren James Lewis
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10319
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00154-CG-N-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WARREN JAMES LEWIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(December 18, 2013)
Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Warren Lewis in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,
Case: 13-10319 Date Filed: 12/18/2013 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lewis’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-10319 Date Filed: 12/18/2013 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.