The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-14496•USA v. Daniel Thomas, Jr.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-14496
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cr-00016-ACC-TBS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DANIEL THOMAS, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 27, 2013)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Harrison T. Slaughter, Jr., appointed counsel for Daniel Thomas, Jr., has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
Case: 12-14496 Date Filed: 03/27/2013 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of
the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Thomas’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 12-14496 Date Filed: 03/27/2013 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.