The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-12836; 12-12837•USA v. Veronica Denise Dale
12-12836; 12-12837Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMar 28, 2013
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-12836
No. 12-12837
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket Nos. 2:10-cr-00242-MEF-WC-1,
2:11-cr-00069-MEF-WC-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
VERONICA DENISE DALE,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Alabama
________________________
(March 28, 2013)
Case: 12-12836 Date Filed: 03/28/2013 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Before MARCUS, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas M. Goggans, counsel for Veronica Denise Dale in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant, and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dale’s convictions and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
In light of this ruling, the government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED AS
MOOT.
Case: 12-12836 Date Filed: 03/28/2013 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.