Full text
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-10491
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00277-CG-C-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RODGER A. GULLEDGE,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(November 9, 2012)
Before BARKETT, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Raymond A. Pierson, appointed counsel for Robert Gulledge in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
Case: 12-10491 Date Filed: 11/09/2012 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gulledge’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Case: 12-10491 Date Filed: 11/09/2012 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
