The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-10075•USA v. Felipe Alberto Vergara
12-10075Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitNov 2, 2012
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-10075
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cr-00113-TJC-TEM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FELIPE ALBERTO VERGARA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 2, 2012)
Before BARKETT, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charles L. Truncale, appointed counsel for Felipe Vergara in this direct
Case: 12-10075 Date Filed: 11/02/2012 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Vergara’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Case: 12-10075 Date Filed: 11/02/2012 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.