Full text
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-16071
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:00-cr-00041-RH-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ERIC BROOKS,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(July 11, 2012)
Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, on behalf of Randolph P. Murrell, Federal Public Defender
and appointed counsel for Eric Brooks in this appeal from the revocation of
Brooks’s supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
-- 1 of 2 --
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87
S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues
of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of
Brooks’s supervised release and his sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
