The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-15599•USA v. Arnaldo Torres Miranda
11-15599Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitNov 16, 2012
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-15599
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00363-SDM-TBM-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARNALDO TORRES MIRANDA,
l lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 16, 2012)
Before WILSON, ANDERSON and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 11-15599 Date Filed: 11/16/2012 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Arnaldo Torres Miranda in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Miranda’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
Case: 11-15599 Date Filed: 11/16/2012 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.