The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-14789•USA v. Vicente Maldonado-Ascencio
11-14789Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 7, 2012
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 7, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-14789
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00007-KD-C-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VICENTE MALDONADO-ASCENCIO,
a.k.a Edwin Maldonado-Poso,
a.k.a. Felix Poso,
a.k.a Jose Molina,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(May 7, 2012)
Before BARKETT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Vicente
Maldonado-Ascencio in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
-- 1 of 2 --
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Maldonado’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.