USA v. Francisco Cortes-Acosta

11-13566Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitFeb 7, 2012

Full text

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FEBRUARY 7, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-13566
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-20110-MGC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FRANCISCO CORTES-ACOSTA,
a.k.a. Francisco Cortez-Acosta,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(February 7, 2012)
Before CARNES, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

-- 1 of 2 --

Miguel Caridad, appointed counsel for Francisco Virgilio Cortez-Acosta in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87
S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Cortez-Acosta’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.