The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-11368•USA v. Eric Ramon Tapscott
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JUNE 14, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-11368
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:10-cr-00265-AKK-PWG-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ERIC RAMON TAPSCOTT,
a.k.a. Ick,
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(June 14, 2012)
Before MARCUS, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
-- 1 of 2 --
Bill Barnett, appointed counsel for Eric Tapscott, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of
the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merits of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Tapscott’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.