The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-10504•USA v. Shedrick Spaulding, Jr.
11-10504Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitNov 16, 2011
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
NOVEMBER 16, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-10504
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:10-cr-00108-BAE-GRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHEDRICK SPAULDING, JR.,
a.k.a. Al,
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(November 16, 2011)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Amy Lee Copeland, appointed counsel for Shedrick Spaulding, Jr., has filed
-- 1 of 2 --
a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merits of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Spaulding’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.