The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-10492•USA v. Michael Nicholas Taylor
11-10492Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitSep 30, 2011
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-10492
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 9:06-cr-80067-KAM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL NICHOLAS TAYLOR,
a.k.a Paul Blake,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(September 30, 2011)
Before BARKETT, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
-- 1 of 2 --
Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans, appointed counsel for Michael Nicholas Taylor
in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation
of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Taylor’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.