USA vs Ian Sean Gordon

11-10304Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitAug 24, 2011

Full text

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUGUST 24, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-10304
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cr-00130-MMH-TEM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
IAN SEAN GORDON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 24, 2011)
Before HULL, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Paul Shorstein, appointed counsel for Ian Sean Gordon in this direct
criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the

-- 1 of 2 --

appellant, because counsel believes that the appeal is without merit. Counsel has
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Gordon’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.