The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-15828•USA v. Alfonso Alverez Banda
10-15828Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 11, 2012
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 11, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-15828
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00133-JRH-WLB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALFONSO ALVEREZ BANDA,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
_________________________
(May 11, 2012)
Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
-- 1 of 3 --
Alfonso Banda appeals his 235-month sentence after being found guilty for
one count of possession with intent to distribute not less than 500 grams of a
mixture of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On appeal,
Banda argues the district court failed to properly consider his age and infirmities at
sentencing, as his sentence essentially equates to life without parole. After review,
we affirm Banda’s sentence.1
Banda does not meet his burden of demonstrating his sentence was
unreasonable in light of the record and the § 3553(a) factors. The district court
explicitly mentioned its consideration of Banda’s age, along with the § 3553(a)
factors, the statements of the parties, and the PSI. See United States v. Talley, 431
F.3d 784, 786 (11th Cir. 2005) (“[A]n acknowledgment by the district court that it
has considered the defendant’s arguments and the factors in section 3553(a) is
sufficient.”). Further, the weight to be given to Banda’s age was within the district
court’s discretion. See United States v. Langston, 590 F.3d 1226, 1237 (11th Cir.
2009). Finally, the court’s sentence of 235 months represented the lowest end of
the applicable guideline range, and we ordinarily expect such a sentence to be
reasonable. See Talley, 431 F.3d at 787-88. Banda was caught with nearly 2
We review the reasonableness of a sentence under a deferential abuse of discretion 1
standard. Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 591 (2007). “The party challenging the sentence
bears the burden to show it is unreasonable in light of the record and the § 3553(a) factors.” United
States v. Tome, 611 F.3d 1371, 1378 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 674 (2010).
2
-- 2 of 3 --
pounds of methamphetamine; his 235-month sentence is procedurally and
substantively reasonable.
AFFIRMED.
3
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.