The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-15637•USA v. Christopher Michael Stanton, a.k.a. Christopher Stanton
10-15637Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 30, 2012
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 30, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-15637
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:06-cr-00011-LC-MD-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL STANTON,
a.k.a. Christopher Stanton,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(May 30, 2012)
Before WILSON, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Christopher Stanton in this direct
-- 1 of 2 --
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant, and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87
S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues
of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Stanton’s convictions
and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.