The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-15471•USA v. Luke Kay
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 26, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-15471
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00343-SDM-TBM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LUKE KAY,
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(July 26, 2011)
Before HULL, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Howard C. Anderson, appointed counsel for Luke Kay, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
-- 1 of 2 --
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the
revocation of Kay’s supervised release and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.