USA vs Vincent Vidal Mitchell

10-11795Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitDec 30, 2010

Full text

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DECEMBER 30, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-11795
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00026-RH-WCS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
VINCENT VIDAL MITCHELL,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(December 30, 2010)
Before EDMONDSON, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, the Federal Public Defender assigned to represent Vincent
Mitchell in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further

-- 1 of 2 --

representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of
the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Mitchell’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.