USA v. Naval Ruiz Murillo

10-11713Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMar 3, 2011

Full text

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MARCH 3, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-11713
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-21064-AJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NAVAL MURILLO RUIZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(March 3, 2011)
Before EDMONDSON, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Sowmya Bharathi, appointed counsel for Naval Murillo Ruiz in this direct

-- 1 of 2 --

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Murillo Ruiz’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.