The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-11243•Antoine St. Cyr v. U.S. Attorney General
10-11243Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJun 2, 2011
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JUNE 2, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-11243
________________________
Agency No. A96-110-017
ANTOINE ST. CYR,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner,
versus
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllRespondent.
________________________
Petition for Review of a Decision of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
________________________
(June 2, 2011)
Before HULL, BLACK and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.*
PER CURIAM:
Honorable Walter K. Stapleton, United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting*
by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error in the Board of
Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA’s”) order, dated February 18, 2010, denying
Petitioner Antoine St. Cyr’s Motion for Reconsideration as to his claim of legal
error relating to the issue of changed country conditions in his future persecution
asylum claim.
We lack jurisdiction to review the underlying BIA decision dated October
15, 2009, because St. Cyr did not file a petition for review of this order. We also
lack jurisdiction to review St. Cyr’s claim of error regarding his humanitarian
asylum claim under 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b)(1)(iii) for failure to exhaust that claim.
Petition for Review DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.