The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-10738•USA v. Harold
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPT 22, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-10738
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:97-cr-00314-HES-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CLAUDE N. HAROLD,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 22, 2010)
Before BARKETT, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Maurice C. Grant, II, appointed counsel for Claude N. Harold in this appeal
from the revocation of Harold’s supervised release and subsequent imposition of
-- 1 of 2 --
an 11-month sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Harold’s
supervised release and his sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.