The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-10193•Edward P. Manturuck v. Richard M. Meeks
10-10193Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitSep 14, 2010
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPTEMBER 14, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 10-10193
Non-Argument Calendar
_____________
D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cv-00079-AAA-JEG
EDWARD P. MANTURUCK,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
RICHARD M. MEEKS, Georgia State
Trooper,
Defendant-Appellee.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
__________________________
(September 14, 2010)
Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM:
We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs. We conclude that the
district court correctly dismissed the complaint.
The statements of conclusions without fact averments do not and did not
meet the plausibility standard of Randall v. Scott, 610 F.3d 701 (11 Cir. 2010).th
Appellant did not and has not moved for permission to amend the
complaint. No amendment was filed or proffered.
AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.