USA v. Pete Perez, III

09-16167Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJul 9, 2010

Full text

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 9, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-16167
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 09-00029-CR-5-001-RS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PETE PEREZ, III,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(July 9, 2010)
Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Pete Perez, III, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

-- 1 of 2 --

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Perez’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.