The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-15831•USA v. Mitchell Kent Jackson
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FEB 2, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-15831
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-00225-CR-1-KD-B
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MITCHELL KENT JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(February 2, 2011)
Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Mitchell Kent Jackson, has filed a
-- 1 of 2 --
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Jackson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.