USA v. Arthur Jones

09-15689Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJun 21, 2010

Full text

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JUNE 21, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-15689
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-20044-CR-ASG
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARTHUR JONES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(June 21, 2010)
Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jacqueline Shapiro, appointed counsel for Arthur Jones in this direct

-- 1 of 2 --

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Jones’s motion to
reduce his sentence per 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 706 is
AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.