The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-14938•USA v. Sherman Lane
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JUNE 14, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-14938
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 08-00091-CR-3-LAC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHERMAN LANE,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(June 14, 2011)
Before BARKETT, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Donald M. Sheehan, appointed counsel for Sherman Lane in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
-- 1 of 2 --
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lane’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.