The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-11839•USA v. Telmore Barrington Dixon
09-11839Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitFeb 25, 2010
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FEB 25, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-11839
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 08-00005-CR-J-20JRK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TELMORE BARRINGTON DIXON,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(February 25, 2010)
Before HULL, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Donald Mairs, appointed counsel for Telmore Barrington Dixon in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
-- 1 of 2 --
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dixon’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.