The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-11111•USA v. Cedric Demonte Trammell
09-11111Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMar 26, 2010
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MARCH 26, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-11111
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-00205-CR-1-VEH-TMP
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CEDRIC DEMONTE TRAMMELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(March 26, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey D. Bramer, appointed counsel for Cedric Demonte Trammell in this
-- 1 of 2 --
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,
87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Trammell’s
conviction and sentence under Count Three are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.