The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-11013•Calvin Lamar Middleton v. Tony Patterson
09-11013Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitAug 19, 2010
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUGUST 19, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-11013
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-00330-CV-WS-C
CALVIN LAMAR MIDDLETON,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
TONY PATTERSON,
Respondent-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(August 19, 2010)
Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
-- 1 of 2 --
In finding that Calvin Lamar Middleton’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus
petition is time-barred, and that he is not entitled to equitable tolling of the
applicable deadline, the district court reasoned that even if Middleton did not learn
that his direct appeal was denied until December 2000, he still had until January 7,
2001 to file his petition. The district court, however, failed to address Middleton’s
assertion that he did not receive his case file from his attorney until January 2001.
In light of that omission, as well as the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Holland
v. Florida, 560 U.S. __, 130 S.Ct. 2549 (2010), we vacate the judgment of the
district court and remand for further consideration. We do so without implying
any view on how the tolling issue should be decided on remand.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.