The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-10254•Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Amore Construction Co.
09-10254Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMar 1, 2010
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MARCH 1, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-10254
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 07-01372-CV-T-26-EAJ
HOME DEPOT USA, INC.,
a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff-Counter-
Defendant-Appellee,
versus
AMORE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
a Florida corporation,
Defendant-Cross-
Defendant-Counter-
Claimant-Appellant,
DAVID BARRON LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
a Florida corporation,
Defendant-Cross-
Claimant-Counter-
Claimant-Appellant.
-- 1 of 2 --
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 1, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In this case, the district court, following a bench trial, found for plaintiff
Home Depot on its claim for declaratory relief and against defendants Amore
Construction and David Barron Land Development on their counterclaims for
breach of contract, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and negligent
misrepresentation. After hearing oral argument of counsel in defendants' appeal,
we agree with the district court, for the reasons stated in its dispositive order of
December 15, 2008, that the defendants' counterclaims lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.