USA v. Robert Allen

08-17089Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitFeb 16, 2010

Full text

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FEB 16, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 08-17089
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00008-CR-5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT ALLEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
_________________________
(February 16, 2010)
Before HULL, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
W. Vincent Settle, III, appointed counsel for Robert Allen, in this direct

-- 1 of 2 --

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Allen’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.