The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-16651•USA v. Cedric Massengale, Jr.
08-16651Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJul 7, 2010
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 7, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 08-16651
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 08-00263-CR-2-LSC-PWG
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CEDRIC MASSENGALE, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northen District of Alabama
_________________________
(July 7, 2010)
Before MARCUS, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
William J. Brower, appointed counsel for Cedric Massengale in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
-- 1 of 2 --
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Massengale’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.