The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-10229•Karantsalis v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, et al.,
10-10229Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMar 11, 2011
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MARCH 11, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-10229
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-22910-PCH
THEODORE D. KARANTSALIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(March 11, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
-- 1 of 10 --
Appellant, a freelance reporter, appeals the denial of his request for “mug shots”
of Luis Giro, an individual convicted of securities fraud. The United States Marshals
Service denied this request by asserting Exemption 7(C) of the Freedom of
Information Act, 5. U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(C). The ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT entered by the district
court on December 14, 2009, is a comprehensive and scholarly discussion of the
issues and law surrounding this request and we hereby adopt it and attach it to this
opinion. We take note of the opinion in Detroit Free Press v. Department of Justice,
73 F.3d 93 (6 th Cir. 1996) and respectfully reject its holding.
AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 10 --
-- 3 of 10 --
-- 4 of 10 --
-- 5 of 10 --
-- 6 of 10 --
-- 7 of 10 --
-- 8 of 10 --
-- 9 of 10 --
-- 10 of 10 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.