The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-12717•Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. Tucker, et al
09-12717Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitApr 30, 2012
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
April 30, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-12717
(D.C. Docket No. 05-00369-CV-RH)
MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. TUCKER,
PAM BONDI,
Respondents-Appellees.
---------------------------
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Florida
--------------------------
(Opinion January 9, 2012, 666 F.3d 1265, 11 th Cir. 2012)
(April 30, 2012)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS,
WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
B Y T H E C O U R T :
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case
should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this Court in active
service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The
previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.