The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-10715•Jimmy Ledford v. Shelby Peeples, Jr.
06-10715Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitSep 23, 2011
[PUBLISH]
# IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-10715
SEP 2 3 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
JIMMY LEDFORD,
LARRY O'DELL,
BRYAN WALKER,
DYNAVISION GROUP, LLC,
SIGNATURE LEASING, LLC,
Plaintiffs-Appellants
Cross-Appellees,
versus
SHELBY PEEPLES, JR.,
PFLC, LLC,
INTERNAL MANAGEMENT, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees
Cross-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES,
BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
<!-- PageBreak -->
Upon the majority vote of the judges in this Court in active service, on
January 19, 2011, this Court vacated this panel's prior opinion and granted
rehearing en banc. See Ledford v. Peeples, 630 F.3d 1345 (11th Cir. 2011) (en
banc); 605 F.3d 871 (11th Cir. 2010), vacated and reh'g en banc granted, 630 F.3d
1345.
We granted rehearing en banc to consider only the district court's denial of
Appellees' motion for sanctions.
After review and given that the Appellees' panel brief limited their cross
appeal on sanctions to paragraphs 64 and 90 of the complaint, the en banc court
cannot say that Appellees in their cross appeal have shown that the district court
abused its discretion in denying sanctions.
The Court did not reconsider en banc the portions of the panel's May 6,
2010 opinion affirming the district court's grant of summary judgment to
Appellees, and therefore the Court remands the case to the panel to reissue Parts I,
II, IV, and V of the panel's May 6, 2010 opinion, which was previously reported as
Ledford v. Peeples, 605 F.3d 871, 877-900, 903-19 (11th Cir. 2010).
AFFIRMED AS TO CROSS APPEAL.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.