The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-5020•United States of America v. Andrew Gibbs, a/k/a Andrew Lee Gibbs
22-5020Court of Appeals for the Tenth CircuitOct 20, 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
_________________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDREW GIBBS, a/k/a Andrew Lee
Gibbs,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 22-5020
(D.C. No. 4:21-CR-00144-GKF-1)
(N.D. Okla.)
_________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
_________________________________
Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
_________________________________
This matter is before us on the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand. The parties
agree that the district court constructively amended the indictment via a jury
instruction defining sexual contact, and Appellant Andrew Gibbs is entitled to relief
for plain error.
Upon consideration, the Joint Motion to Remand is granted. Mr. Gibbs’
conviction on Count Two is vacated. This appeal is dismissed and this matter is
* In light of the parties’ joint motion, oral argument is not necessary, and this
matter is submitted on the briefs. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law
of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its
persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
October 20, 2022
Christopher M. Wolpert
Clerk of Court
Appellate Case: 22-5020 Document: 010110756228 Date Filed: 10/20/2022 Page: 1
-- 1 of 2 --
2
remanded with instructions to the district court to enter an amended judgment as to
County Three only consistent with the Joint Motion to Remand.
The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.
Entered for the Court
Per Curiam
Appellate Case: 22-5020 Document: 010110756228 Date Filed: 10/20/2022 Page: 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.