David H. Coltin v. Town of Londonderry

99-1849United States Court Of Appeals For The 1st CircuitSep 14, 2000

Full text

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 99-1849
DAVID H. COLTIN,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
TOWN OF LONDONDERRY; CHRISTOPHER CHILDS; WILLIAM R. HART JR.;
ETHEL COLTIN; FRANCIS RAPISARDI,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
David H. Coltin on brief pro se.
Donald E. Gardner and Devine, Millimet & Branch on brief for
appellees.
SEPTEMBER 8, 2000

-- 1 of 2 --

Per Curiam. Plaintiff Coltin appeals from a summary
judgment dismissing all claims in his complaint on the
merits. The complaint asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. §
1983, as well as state law claims of false arrest and
malicious prosecution. Upon de novo review of the judgment
in light of the parties' briefs and appendix materials, we
affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the
district court's thorough and well-reasoned opinion of May
5, 1999, and in the order denying reconsideration of June 9,
1999.
Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27(c).

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.