George Washington v. Cumberland County Jail

Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter
Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 05-1594
GEORGE WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
Before
Boudin, Chief Judge,
Torruella and Howard, Circuit Judges.
George Washington, on brief pro se.
Michael J. Schmidt, on brief for defendant, appellee.
December 30, 2005

-- 1 of 2 --

Accordingly, we shall not appoint of counsel for the 1
appellant.
-2-
Per Curiam. After carefully considering the briefs and
record on appeal, we affirm the judgment below.1
The record at summary judgment failed to reveal any
trial-worthy issue. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Triangle Trading Co.,
Inc., v. Robroy Indus., Inc. 200 F.3d 1 (1 Cir. 1999). Among st
other problems, the appellant admitted that he never exhausted
administrative remedies concerning his claim that he was denied
access to legal materials. Nicolo v. Philip Morris, Inc., 201 F.3d
29 (1 Cir. 2000). In addition, he raises new issues on appeal st
that were not developed below, thus, are not properly before us.
Hernandez-Hernandez v. United States, 904 F.2d 758 (1 Cir. 1990). st
Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c).

-- 2 of 2 --