The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
S225193•People v. Patterson (Ron Douglas)
1
Filed 5/24/17
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S225193
v. )
) Ct. App. 4/2 E060758
RON DOUGLAS PATTERSON, )
) Riverside County
Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. EE220540
____________________________________)
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
THE COURT:
The opinion filed herein on March 27, 2017, appearing at 2 Cal.5th 885, is
modified as follows:
The first sentence of the second paragraph on page 901 is revised to read: “To
establish that he was prejudiced by counsel‟s alleged errors, Patterson must show „that
a reasonable probability exists that, but for counsel‟s incompetence, he would not
have pled guilty‟ (Resendiz, supra, 25 Cal.4th at p. 253) to the charge of possession of
MDMA, which subjected him to mandatory deportation.”
This modification does not affect the judgment.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.