The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
S099549•People v. Lopez (Michael Augustine), [Automatic Appeal]
S099549Supreme Court of CaliforniaAug 15, 2018
Filed 8/15/18
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S099549
v. )
)
MICHAEL AUGUSTINE LOPEZ, )
) Alameda County
Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. H28492A
____________________________________)
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND
DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
THE COURT:
The opinion in this matter filed June 28, 2018, and appearing at 5 Cal.5th 339,
is modified as follows:
In the first sentence of the second full paragraph on page 353, the following
words are deleted: “that a competency ruling under Evidence Code section 701 was
not sufficient and.” As modified, the sentence will now read: “We reject Lopez’s
argument that the trial court was required to hold a hearing under Evidence Code
section 702.”
The modification does not affect the judgment.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.