The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
S057242•People v. Spencer (Christopher Alan), [Automatic Appeal]
S057242Supreme Court of CaliforniaSep 12, 2018
1
Filed 9/12/18
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S057242
v. )
)
CHRISTOPHER ALAN SPENCER, )
) Santa Clara County
Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. 155731
____________________________________ )
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND
DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
THE COURT:
The opinion in this matter filed July 12, 2018, and appearing at 5 Cal.5th 642,
is modified as follows:
On page 677 of the opinion, the first sentence in the paragraph beginning, “With
the exception of the photographs, Spencer does not appear to have objected to the
introduction of the victim impact evidence” is modified to add “specifically” before
“objected,” “particular” before “victim,” and “at issue” to end the sentence. As
modified, the sentence will now read:
With the exception of the photographs, Spencer does
not appear to have specifically objected to the introduction
of the particular victim impact evidence at issue.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
The footnote appended to this sentence (fn. 5) is unchanged.
This modification does not affect the judgment.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.