Whisman Elementary School District (PERB A214E)

PERB Order No. A214ECalperbOct 3, 1990

Full text

STATE 	OF 	CALIFORNIA
DECISION OF 	THE
PUBLIC 	EMPLOYMENT 	RELATIONS 	BOARD
CALIFORNIA 	SCHOOL 	EMPLOYEES
ASSOCIATION AND 	ITS 	CHAPTER 	#355,
Charging 	Party,
v.
WHISMAN 	ELEMENTARY 	SCHOOL 	DISTRICT,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
____________________ )
Case 	No. 	SF-CE-1316
ORDER 	FOR 	BRIEFING
PERB 	Order 	No. 	Ad-214
October 	3, 	1990
Appearances: 	Patricia 	L. 	Roy, 	Senior 	Field 	Representative, 	for
California 	School 	Employees 	Association 	and 	its 	Chapter 	#355;
Littler, 	Mendelson, 	Fastiff 	& 	Tichy 	by 	Richard 	M. 	Noack,
Attorney, 	for 	Whisman 	Elementary 	School 	District.
Before 	Craib, 	Shank 	and 	Cunningham, 	Members.
ORDER
CUNNINGHAM, 	Member: 	On 	September 	25, 	1990, 	the 	Whisman
Elementary 	School 	District 	(District) 	filed 	a 	Motion 	To 	File
Supplemental 	Brief. 	The 	District 	bases 	its 	request 	on 	the
recent 	ruling 	of 	the 	California 	Court 	of 	Appeal 	in 	San 	Diego
Adult 	Educators, 	Local 	4289 	v. 	Public 	Employment 	Relations 	Board
(Sept. 	12, 	1990, 	D009280) 	Cal.App. 3d 	In 	order 	to 	obtain
a 	complete 	record, 	the 	Public 	Employment 	Relations 	Board 	(Board)
grants 	the 	District's 	motion, 	and 	requests 	the 	parties 	brief 	the
factual 	and 	legal 	issues 	herein 	in 	relation 	to 	the 	court's 	ruling
in 	San 	Diego. 	The 	District's 	brief 	must 	be 	filed 	with 	the 	Board
itself 	20 	days 	following 	service 	of 	this 	Order 	and 	the 	California
School 	Employees 	Association's 	brief 	will 	be 	due 	20 	days
following 	service 	of 	the 	District's 	brief.
Members 	Craib 	and 	Shank 	joined 	in 	this 	Order.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.