PERB Order No. A198E•Butte Community College District (PERB A198E)
Full text
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DECISION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD BUTTE COUNTY PART-TIME FACULTY ASSOCIATION/COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. BUTTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, Employer. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ____________________ ) Case No. S-R-836 Administrative Appeal PERB Order No. Ad-198 November 1, 1989 Appearance: Brown and Conradi by William E. Brown, Attorney, for Butte Community College District. Before Hesse, Chairperson; Porter and Shank, Members. DECISION HESSE, Chairperson: Following the issuance of a proposed decision by an agent of the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB or Board), the Butte Community College District (District), pursuant to Regulation 32300, 1 filed timely exceptions to the Board agent 1 s determination that a separate unit of part-time faculty was appropriate. The Butte County Part-time Faculty Association/CWA did not file exceptions or a response to the District's exceptions. Thereafter, the parties entered into a proposed settlement agreement and the Sacramento Regional Director requested that the matter be remanded for further proceedings. The Board remanded the matter and held the exceptions to the proposed decision in abeyance. (Butte 1PERB Regulations are codified at California Administrative Code, title 8, section 31001 et seq.
Community College District (1989) PERB Order No. Ad-196.) Pursuant to the proposed settlement agreement, the District filed a withdrawal, with prejudice, of its exceptions to the proposed decision. The Board has considered the request for withdrawal and concurs that a withdrawal is in the best interest of the parties and is consistent with the purposes of the Educational Employment Relations Act section 3540 et seq. Accordingly, the Board grants the District's request to withdraw, with prejudice, its exceptions to the proposed decision. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the exceptions to the Board agent's determination in Case No. S-R-836 are WITHDRAWN WITH PREJUDICE. Members Porter and Shank joined in this Decision. 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.