PERB Order No. A094E•Solano Community College District (PERB A094E)
Full text
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DECISION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD SOLANO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, Employer, and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 614, AFL/CIO, Appellant, and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, STATIONARY LOCAL #39, Employee Organization, and CALIFORNIA SCHOOL. EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION and its Chapter #211 Employee Organization. ). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. SF-D-66 (R-394) PERB Order No. Ad-94 ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL July 11, 1980 Ap earances: 1 William H. Wilson, Superintendent/President for So ano Community College District; Robert J. Bezemek, Attorney forService Employees International Union, Local 614, AFL/CIO and International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Local #39, AFL/CIO; Steven T. Nutter, Attorney for California· School Employees Association. Before Gluck, Chairperson; Moore, Member. DECISION AND ORDER The Service Employees International Union Local 614 (hereafter SEIU) has appealed the dismissal, by the San Francisco regional director, of its decertification petition in the above-captioned case. Subsequent to the appeal SEIU asked that the Board remand
the case to the regional director. Upon review of the reasoning and determination in this case the Board summarily affirms the decision of the regional director. The appeal and remand are DENIED. PER CURIAM
/!.\:. t·•~·,', STATE OF CALIFORNIA ·~. C ( EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Gov,.mor PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT REl.ATIONS BOARD San Francisco Regional Office 17_7 Post St., 9th Floor 5an Francisco, California 94108 (415) 557-1350 April 15, 1980 Mr. Robert J. Bezemek, Esq. Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg & Roger 45 Polk Street San Francisco, California 94102 Superintendent Solano Community College District P. 0. Box 246 Suisun Valley Road Suisun City, California 94585 California·school Employees Association and its Chapter #211 c/o Solano Community College District P. 0. Box 246 Suisun Valley Road Suisun City, California 94585 · Re: s~-394) SF-D-67 (R-394) SF-R-394-1 SF-R-394X SF-D-57 (R-394) Dear Interested Parties: On March 24, 1980, the following documents were received by this office: 1) A decertification petition pursuant to PERB Regulation 33240 from Service Employees International Union, Local 6llf for a unit of office, technical and para-professional employees (SF-D-66, R-394); 2) A decertification petition pursuant to PERB Regulation 33240 from International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Local No. 39, AFL-CIO for a unit of operations and support services employees(SF-D-67, R-394); 3) A request for recognition pursuant to PERB Regulation 33050 from International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Local No. 39ctl".P. Service. Employees International Union, Local 614 for the .. esiablished unit of all classified employees (SF-R-394-1); 4) A request for recognition.pursuant to PERB Regulation 33050 from International Union of Operating Engineers> Stationary Local No. 39 for a unit of operations and support services employees (SF-R-394X); and,
April 15, 1980 Robert J. Bezemek, Esq. Solano Community College District California School Ew~loyees Association and its Chapter #211 C Page Two ( 5) A decertification petition pursuant to PERB Regulation 33240 from International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Local No. 39 and Service Employees International Union, Local 614 for the established unit of all classified employees (SF-D-57, R-394). International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Local No. 39 and/or Service Employees International Union Local 614 indicated in the various decertification petitions and/or requests for recognition that: 1) the established classified unit in the Solano Community College District is a unit consisting of all classified employees; 2) California School Employees Association and its Chapter #211 was recognized on·or about July 1, 1977 (our records show that CSEA was certified on October 3, 1977); 3) A written agreement currently exists between the exclusive representa- tive and the employer; and, 4) the expiration date of that agreement is June 30, 1980. Review of the various decertification petitions and requests for recognition has resulted in the· administrative determination that SF-D-66 (R~394),SF-D-67 (R-394) and SF-R-394-1 should be dismissed since they have been improperly filed. In that both SF-D-66 and SF-D-67 seek to carve out new units from the established unit of all classified employees, the petitions should have been filed as requests for recognition pursuant to PERE Regulation 33050. SF-R-394-1 is also improperly filed because it requests recognition for an established unit which has an exclusive representative in place. This request should have been filed ·as a decertification petition pursuant to PERE Regulation 33240. This office will. proceed with both SF-R-394X and SF-D-57 since both have been properly filed. An appeal of this decision may be made to the Board itself within ten (10) calendar days of service of this letter by filing a statement of the facts upon which the appeal is based with the Executive Assistant to the Board at 923 12th Street, Suite 201, Sacramento, California 95814. Copies ofany appeal must be concurrently served upon all parties and the San Francisco Regional Office. Proof of service of the appeal must be filed with the Executive Assistant.
April 15, 1980 Robert J. Bezemeki E~ •. So.lane Community College District California School Employees Association and its Chapter #211 Page Three Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me. Ve~y truly yours, James W. T.amin Regional Director AIM:JWT:ma cc: Robert Russell Walt Norris
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.