California State University (PERB 0633H)

PERB Decision No. 0633HCalperbSep 24, 1987

Full text

STATE 	OF 	CALIFORNIA
DECISION 	OF 	THE
PUBLIC 	EMPLOYMENT 	RELATIONS 	BOARD
CALIFORNIA 	FACULTY ASSOCIATION,
Charging 	Party,
v.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case 	No. 	LA-CE-153-H
PERB 	Decision 	No. 	633-H
September 	24, 	1987
)
Appearances: 	Jacob M. 	Samit and William B. 	Haughton, 	Attorney,
for California 	State 	University; 	Paul 	B. 	Worthman, 	Associate
General 	Manager, 	for 	California 	Faculty Association.
Before Hesse, 	Chairperson; 	Porter and Shank, 	Members.
DECISION AND 	ORDER
The parties 	in 	the above-entitled 	case, 	having 	settled
their 	disputes 	arising out 	of 	negotiations 	for 	a 	new 	collective
bargaining 	agreement, 	request 	that 	the proposed decision 	issued
by 	the 	administrative 	law 	judge 	be 	vacated 	and 	that 	the 	unfair
practice 	charge 	and 	complaint be 	dismissed. 	The 	Public
Employment 	Relations 	Board has 	considered 	the 	request 	and
concurs 	that 	such a 	dismissal 	is 	in 	the 	interest 	of 	the parties
and 	the 	Board 	and 	is 	consistent 	with 	the purposes 	of 	the 	Higher
Education 	Employer-Employee 	Relations Act 	(Gov. 	Code 	sec. 	3570
et 	seq.).
It 	is 	hereby ORDERED that 	the proposed decision 	in 	the
above 	case 	is VACATED and 	that 	the 	charge 	and 	complaint 	in 	Case
No. 	LA-CE-153-H 	are 	hereby 	DISMISSED.
By 	the 	Board1
1Members 	Craib 	and Cordoba 	did 	not 	participate 	in 	the
case.
)
______)

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.