Regents of the University of California Service (PERB 0245HC)

STATE
	OF
	CALIFORNIA
DECISION
	OF
	THE
PUBLIC
	EMPLOYMENT
	RELATIONS
	BOARD
IN
	THE 	MATTER
	OF: 	)
)
UNIT
	DETERMINATION
	FOR
SERVICE 	)
EMPLOYEES
	OF 	THE
	UNIVERSITY
	OF
	)CALIFORNIA
	PURSUANT
	TO
	CHAPTER
	744 	)
OF
	THE
	STATUTES
	OF
	1978
	(HIGHER
	)
EDUCATION
	EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE
	)
RELATIONS
	ACT)
	)
___________________
)
Case 	Nos.
SF-RR-1002-H
	et
	al.
PERB
	Decision
	No. 	245c-H
March
	31,
	1983
Appearances:	
Philip
E.
	Callis,
	Attorney 	for
	California
	State
Employees
	Association;
	Glenn
	Rothner, 	Attorney
	(Reich,
	Adell
	&
Crest)
	for
	American
	Federation 	of
	State,
	County
	and
	MunicipalEmployees,
	AFL-CIO;
	Douglas
	H.
	Barton,
	Bonnie
	Kathleen 	Gibson,
Lynne 	C.
	Hermle 	and 	Mary Maloney
	Roberts, 	Attorneys 	(Corbett,
Kane, 	Berk	
&	
Barton)
	and 	James
	N.
	Odle,
	Associate
	Counsel
	for
the
	Regents
	of
	the
	University 	of
	California.
Before 	Tovar,
	Jaeger,
	Morgenstern
	and
	Burt,
	Members.
DECISION.
On
	September 	30, 	1982,
	the 	Public
	Employment
	Relations
Board
	(PERB
	or
	Board)
	issued
	a
	decision
*Chairperson
	Gluck
	did 	not
	participate
	in
	this
	decision.
unit
	Determination 	for 	Service
	Employees
	of 	the
University 	of 	California
	Pursuant 	to
	Chapter
	744
	of
	Statutes
	of
1978 	(Hi
	her 	Education
Em
	lo
	er-Em
	lo
	ee
	Relations
	Act)(9 	30 	82)
	PERB
	Decision
	No. 	245-H. 	See
	also
	t 	e
	ec1s1on
concerning 	requests 	for
	reconsideration
	and
	judicial
	review,
Unit 	Determination 	for 	Technical
	Employees;
	Clerical
	Employees;
Service
Employees;
	Professional 	Scientists
	and
	Engineers,
Lawrence 	Livermore 	National 	Laboratory; 	Professional
Librarians;
	and
	Professional 	Patient
	Care Employees
	of 	the
University 	of 	California 	Pursuant 	to 	Chapter
	744
	of 	the
Statutes 	of
	1978 	(Higher 	Education Employer-Employee
	RelationsAct) 	(2/ 4/8 3) 	PERB
	Decision 	Nos. 	24la-H 	and 	244a-H 	through248a-H.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DECISION OF THE
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF:
UNIT DETERMINATION FOR SERVICE
EMPLOYEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 744
OF THE STATUTES OF 1978 (HIGHER
EDUCATION EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE
RELATIONS ACT)
Case Nos.
SF-RR-1002-H et al.
PERB Decision No. 245c-H
March 31, 1983
Appearances: Philip E. Callis, Attorney for California State
Employees Association; Glenn Rothner, Attorney (Reich, Adell &
Crost) for American Federation of State, County and Municipal
Employees, AFL-CIO; Douglas H. Barton, Bonnie Kathleen Gibson,
Lynne C. Hermle and Mary Maloney Roberts, Attorneys (Corbett,
Kane, Berk & Barton) and James N. Odle, Associate Counsel for
the Regents of the University of California.
Before Tovar, Jaeger, Morgenstern and Burt, Members. * 	*
DECISION
On September 30, 1982, the Public Employment Relations
Board (PERB or Board) issued a decision under the Higher	
l	
under
	the
	Higher
*Chairperson Gluck did not participate in this decision.
lUnit Determination for Service Employees of the
University of California Pursuant to Chapter 744 of Statutes of
1978 (Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act)
(9/30/82) PERB Decision No. 245-H. See also the decision
concerning requests for reconsideration and judicial review,
Unit Determination for Technical Employees; Clerical Employees;
Service Employees; Professional Scientists and Engineers,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; Professional
Librarians; and Professional Patient Care Employees of the
University of California Pursuant to Chapter 744 of the
Statutes of 1978 (Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations
Act) (2/4/83) PERB Decision Nos. 241a-H and 244a-Hi through
248 a-H.

Education
Employer-Employee
	Relations
	Act
	(HEERA)2	
creating
two
	bargaining
	units
	of
	service
	employees
	at
	the
	University
	of
California
	(UC). 	One
	unit
	consisted
	of 	the
	service
	employees
at
	the
	Lawrence
	Livermore
	National 	Laboratory
	(LLNL), 	and
	the
second
	consisted 	of
	all
	other
	service
	employees
	throughout
	the
UC
	system.
	Pending
	that 	decision,
	exclusionary
	issues
	were
raised
	by
	the
	parties
	with
	respect
	to
	the
	alleged 	managerial,
supervisory,
	confidential
	and
	casual
	status
	of
	employees
	in
these
	units. e	
3	
The 	Board
	has
	previously
	decided
	the
The
	HEERA
	is
	codified
	at
	Government 	Code
	section
	3560
et
	seq. 	All
	statutory
	references 	are 	to
	the
	Government 	Code
unless
	otherwise
	indicated.
subsection
	3562(1)
	of
	HEERA
	provides:
"Managerial
	employee" 	means 	any 	employee
having
	significant 	responsibilities
	for
formulating 	or 	administering
	policies
	and
programs.
	No
	employee
	or
	group
	of
	employees
shall
	be 	deemed
	to
	be
	managerial
	employees
solely
	because 	the
	employee
	or 	group
	of
employees
	participate
	in
	decisions
	with
respect 	to 	courses, 	curriculum, 	personnel
and
	other 	matters 	of
	educational 	policy.
	A
department
	chair
	or
	head
	of
	a
	similar
academic
	unit
	or
	program
	who
	performs 	the
foregoing
	duties 	primarily
	on
	behalf 	of 	the
members
	of 	the 	academic
	unit
	or
	program
shall
	not
	be 	deemed 	a
	managerial
	employee
solely
	because 	of
	such
	duties.
Section
	3580.3
	of
	HEERA
	provides:
"Supervisory
	employee" 	means 	any
	individual,
regardless 	of 	th 	job
	description
	or
	title,
having
	authority, 	in 	the
	interest
	of 	theemployer
	to 	hire, 	transfer,
	suspend, 	lay
off, 	recall,
	promote, 	discharge, 	assign,
2
Education Employer-Employee Relations Act (HEERA) 2 creating
two bargaining units of service employees at the University of
California (UC). One unit consisted of the service employees
at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) , and the
second consisted of all other service employees throughout the
UC system. 	Pending that decision, exclusionary issues were
raised by the parties with respect to the alleged managerial,
supervisory, confidential and casual status of employees in
these units. Th 	Board has previously decided the
22The HEERA is codified at Government Code section 3560
et seq. 	All statutory references are to the Government Code
unless otherwise indicated.
3	
3subsection 3562 (1) of HEERA provides:
"Managerial employee" means any employee
having significant responsibilities for
formulating or administering policies and
programs. No employee or group of employees
shall be deemed to be managerial employees
solely because the employee or group of
employees participate in decisions with
respect to courses, curriculum, personnel
and other matters of educational policy. 	A
department chair or head of a similar
academic unit or program who performs the
foregoing duties primarily on behalf of the
members of the academic unit or program
shall not be deemed a managerial employee
solely because of such duties.
Section 3580.3 of HEERA provides:
"Supervisory employee" means any individual,
regardless of th job description or title,
having authority, in the interest of the
employer to hire, transfer, suspend, lay
off, recall, promote, discharge, assign,
2

exclusionary 	issues
	in 	the
	LLNL
	service 	unit.
reward, 	or
	discipline
	other
	employees, 	or
responsibility
	to
	direct
	them,
	or
	to
	adjust
their
	grievances,
	or
	effectively
	to
recommend
	such
	action,
	if,
	in 	connection
with 	the
	foregoing,
	the
	exercise 	of
	such
authority
	is
	not 	of
	a
	merely
	routine
	or
clerical
	nature,
	but
	requires
	the
	use
	of
independent 	judgment.
	With
	respect 	to
faculty
	or
	academic 	employees,
	any
department
	chair,
	head
	of
	a
	similar
	academic
unit
	or
	program,
	or
	other
	employee
	who
performs 	the 	foregoing
	duties 	primarily
	inthe
	interest
	of
	and 	on
	behalf
	of
	the
	members
of 	the
	academic
	department,
	unit
	or
	program,
shall
	not
	be 	deemed 	a
	supervisory
	employee
solely
	because
	of
	such
	duties;
	provided,
that
	with
	respect
	to 	the
	University 	of
California
	and
	Hastings 	College 	of 	the
	Law,
there
	shall
	be 	a
	rebuttable
	presumption
	that
such
	an
	individual
	appointed
	by
	the
	employer
to
	an
	indefinite
	term
	shall
	be 	deemed
	to
	be
a
	supervisor.
	Employees
	whose
	duties
	are
substantially 	similar 	to 	those-of
	their
subordinates
	shall
	not
	be
	considered
	to
	be
supervisory
	employees.
Subsection
	3562(e) 	of
	HEERA
	provides:
"Confidential
	employee"
	means 	any 	employee
who
	is
	required 	to
	develop 	or
	present
management
	positions
	with
	respect 	to
	meeting
and
	conferring 	or
	whose
	duties
	normally
require
	access
	to 	confidential
	information
which
	contributes 	significantly
	to 	thedevelopment
	of
	such
	management
	positions.
Managerial
	and
	confidential
	employees
	are 	excluded
	from
coverage
	under
	HEERA
	in 	subsection 	3562(f). 	Supervisoryemployees 	have
	limited 	rights
	as
	set 	forth 	in 	section
	3580
et.
	seq.
4unit 	Determination 	for 	Service
	Employees, 	Lawrence
Livermore 	National 	Laboratory 	of 	the 	University 	of
	California,Pursuant 	of 	Chapter
	744
	of 	the 	Statutes 	of
	1978 	(Higher
Education Employer-Employee 	Act) 	(3/8/83)
	PERB
	DecisionNo. 	245b-H.
3
exclusionary issues in the LLNL service unit. 4	
4
reward, or discipline other employees, or
responsibility to direct them, or to adjust
their grievances, or effectively to
recommend such action, if, in connection
with the foregoing, the exercise of such
authority is not of a merely routine or
clerical nature, but requires the use of
independent judgment. With respect to
faculty or academic employees, any
department chair, head of a similar academic
unit or program, or other employee who
performs the foregoing duties primarily in
the interest of and on behalf of the members
of the academic department, unit or program,
shall not be deemed a supervisory employee
solely because of such duties; provided,
that with respect to the University of
California and Hastings College of the Law,
there shall be a rebuttable presumption that
such an individual appointed by the employer
to an indefinite term shall be deemed to be
a supervisor. Employees whose duties are
substantially similar to those of their
subordinates shall not be considered to be
supervisory employees.
Subsection 3562 (e) of HEERA provides:
"Confidential employee" means any employee
who is required to develop or present
management positions with respect to meeting
and conferring or whose duties normally
require access to confidential information
which contributes significantly to the
development of such management positions.
Managerial and confidential employees are excluded from
coverage under HEERA in subsection 3562 (f) . Supervisory
employees have limited rights as set forth in section 3580
et. seq.
4Unit Determination for Service Employees, Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory of the University of California,
Pursuant of Chapter 744 of the Statutes of 1978 (Higher
Education Employer-Employee Act) (3/8/83) PERB Decision
No. 245b-H.

In 	the
	systemwide
	service
	unit,
	the
	parties
	have
	stipulated
for
	the 	purposes
	of
	any
	representation 	election
	to 	the
exclusion,
	as
	managerial,
	supervisory
	or
	confidential,
	of
	the
classifications
	and
	employees
	listed
	in
	Appendices
	A and 	B
attached 	hereto.
	The
	parties
	have
	also
	stipulated 	that
	each
employee
	organization
	may
	identify
	certain
	disputed
	employees
who
	shall
	vote 	challenged
	ballots
	in
	any
	representation
election
	if
	the
	parties
	are
	unable
	to
	agree
	whether
	they 	should
be
	included 	in 	or 	excluded
	from
	the
	unit.
	The
	Board
	has
	held
that
	it
	will
	approve
	a
	stipulation
	in
	a
	unit
	determination
matter
	when
	the
	stipulation
	does
	not 	contravene 	the
	Act
	or
established
	Board
	policies.
	Centinela 	Valley
	Union 	High
	School
District
	(8/7/78)
	PERB
	Decision
	No.
	62.
	A
review
	of 	the 	record
herein 	reveals
	that
	it
	is
	adequate
	to 	support 	the
stipulations.
	Therefore,
	the
	stipulations
	are
	approved
	by
	the
Board.
The
	only
	remaining
	exclusionary 	issues 	to
	be
	decided
	in 	the
systemwide
	service 	unit 	are 	those 	involving 	alleged 	casual
employees.
The 	Board 	does 	not
	specifically
	designate 	these
classifications
	and 	employees 	as 	managerial, 	supervisory 	or
confidential.
	In 	the
	State
	Employer-Employee
	Relations 	Act,Phase
	III,
	Unit 	Determination 	Proceeding 	(10/18/79)
	PERB
	OrderNo. 	Ad-79-S, 	the
	Board
	stated 	that
	it:
..•
	views 	the 	focus 	of 	the 	Phase
	III
	unitdetermination 	proceedings 	to
	be 	a
determination 	of 	those 	rank 	and
	file
employees 	who
	are 	to
	be
	included 	in 	the
designated 	appropriate 	units.
	However, 	the
4
In the systemwide service unit, the parties have stipulated
for the purposes of any representation election to the
exclusion, as managerial, supervisory or confidential, of the
classifications and employees listed in Appendices A and B
attached hereto. The parties have also stipulated that each
employee organization may identify certain disputed employees
who shall vote challenged ballots in any representation
election if the parties are unable to agree whether they should
be included in or excluded from the unit. The Board has held
that it will approve a stipulation in a unit determination
matter when the stipulation does not contravene the Act or
established Board policies. Centinela Valley Union High School
District (8/7/78) PERB Decision No. 62. A review of the record
herein reveals that it is adequate to support the
stipulations. Therefore, the stipulations are approved by the
Board. 5
5
The only remaining exclusionary issues to be decided in the
systemwide service unit are those involving alleged casual
employees .
5	The Board does not specifically designate these
classifications and employees as managerial, supervisory or
confidential. In the State Employer-Employee Relations Act,
Phase III, Unit Determination Proceeding (10/18/79) PERB Order
No. Ad-79-S, the Board stated that it:
views the focus of the Phase III unit
determination proceedings to be a
determination of those rank and file
employees who are to be included in the
designated appropriate units. 	However, the

CASUAL 	ISSUES
Casual 	employees 	are 	those 	who, 	due 	to 	their 	sporadic 	or
intermittent 	relationship 	with 	the 	employer, 	lack 	a 	sufficient
community 	of 	interest 	with 	regular 	employees 	to 	be 	included 	in
the 	representational 	unit. 	Unit 	Determination 	for 	Employees 	of
the 	California 	State 	University 	and 	Colleges 	Pursuant 	to
Chapter 	744 	of 	the 	Statutes 	of 	1978 	(Higher 	Education
Employer-Employee 	Relations 	Act) 	(9/22/81) 	PERB 	Decision
No. 	173-H; 	citing 	Mission 	Pak 	Co. 	(1960) 	127 	NLRB 	1097 	[46 	LRRM
1161]. 	In 	considering 	the 	status 	of 	alleged 	casual 	employees
and 	the 	appropriateness 	of 	excluding 	them 	from 	the 	systemwide
service 	unit, 	we 	are 	required 	to 	consider 	the 	following
criteria 	set 	forth 	in 	subsection 	3579(a) 	of 	HEERA 	which, 	in
pertinent 	part, 	provides:
burden 	is 	on 	the 	. 	party 	which 	may 	seek
to 	exclude 	employees 	from 	units 	because 	of
alle9ed 	managerial, 	supervisory 	or
confidential 	status--to 	affirmatively
justify 	their 	exclusion. 	This 	can 	be 	done
by 	showing 	evidence 	of 	actual 	job
requirements 	which 	would 	disqualify 	the
subject 	employees 	from 	placement 	in
representation 	units 	irrespective 	of 	which
exclusionary 	category 	those 	employees 	may
fit.
Thus, 	the 	Board 	only 	approves 	the 	exclusion 	of 	the
classifications 	and 	employees 	from 	the 	unit 	and 	not 	the
specific 	bases 	for 	the 	exclusions.
5
CASUAL ISSUES
Casual employees are those who, due to their sporadic or
intermittent relationship with the employer, lack a sufficient
community of interest with regular employees to be included in
the representational unit. Unit Determination for Employees of
the California State University and Colleges Pursuant to
Chapter 744 of the Statutes of 1978 (Higher Education
Employer-Employee Relations Act) (9/22/81) PERB Decision
No. 173-H; citing Mission Pak Co. (1960) 127 NLRB 1097 [46 LRRM
1161]. In considering the status of alleged casual employees
and the appropriateness of excluding them from the systemwide
service unit, we are required to consider the following
criteria set forth in subsection 3579 (a) of HEERA which, in
pertinent part, provides:
(a) In each case where the appropriateness
of a unit is an issue, in determining an
appropriate unit, the board shall take into
consideration all of the following criteria:
(a) 	In 	each 	case 	where 	the 	appropriateness
of 	a 	unit 	is 	an 	issue, 	in 	determining 	an
appropriate 	unit, 	the 	board 	shall 	take 	into
consideration 	all 	of 	the 	following 	criteria:
burden is on the . . . party which may seek
to exclude employees from units because of
alleged managerial, supervisory or
confidential status--to affirmatively
justify their exclusion. This can be done
by showing evidence of actual job
requirements which would disqualify the
subject employees from placement in
representation units irrespective of which
exclusionary category those employees may
fit.
Thus, the Board only approves the exclusion of the
classifications and employees from the unit and not the
specific bases for the exclusions.
5

(1) 	The
	internal
	and
	occupational
community
	of
	interest
	among
	the
employees,
	including~ 	but 	not
	limited
to,
	the
	extent 	to
	which
	they 	perform
functionally 	related
	services
	or
	work
toward
	established
	common
	goals,
	the
history
	of
	employee
	representation
	with
the
	employer, 	the
	extent 	to
	which
	suchemployees
	belong
	to
	the
	same
	employee
organization,
	the
	extent 	to
	which
	the
employees·
have
	common
	skills,
	working
conditions,
	job
	duties,
	or
	similareducational
	or
	training
	requirements,
and
	the
	extent 	to
	which
	the
	employeeshave
	common
	supervision.
In 	addition 	to
	the
	above
	statutory
	criteria,
	the
	Board
	has
consistently
	held, 	in
	accordance 	with
	other
	jurisdictions, 	that
such
	factors
	as
	qualifications,
	job
	function,
	compensation,
hours 	of
	work,
	fringe
	benefits, 	integration
	of
	work
	function,
and
	interchange
	between 	employees
	are 	relevant 	in 	determining
community
	of
	interest.
•••
	community
	of
	interest 	is
	not
determined
	by
	going
	down 	a
	check
	list
	ofthese
	factors.
	The
	point 	of 	the
	comparison
is
	to 	reveal
	the
	interests
	of 	the
	employeesand
	ascertain
	whether 	they 	share
	a
substantial
	mutual
	interest
	in 	matters
subject 	to
	meeting
	and
	negotiation.(Citation 	omitted.)
	The
	interests
	ofincluded
	employees 	must 	be
	mutual 	not
distinct,
	and
	substantial
	not 	tenuous.Thus, 	employees
	may 	be
	excluded
	from 	a
particular 	unit 	either
	because
	their
interests
	are 	separate
	and
	apart
	from
	those
Hartnell
	Community
	College
	District 	(l/2/79)
	PERB
Decision
	No. 	81; 	Monterey 	Peninsula
	Community
	College
	District
(10/16/78)
	PERB
	Decision
	No. 	76. 	See
	also
	Kalamazoo 	Paper 	Box
Corp. 	(1962) 	136
	NLRB
	134 	[49
	LRRM
	1715].
6
stated in Monterey Peninsula
Community College District, Id.:
(1) The internal and occupational
community of interest among the
employees, including, but not limited
to, the extent to which they perform
functionally related services or work
toward established common goals, the
history of employee representation with
the employer, the extent to which such
employees belong to the same employee
organization, the extent to which the
employees have common skills, working
conditions, job duties, or similar
educational or training requirements,
and the extent to which the employees
have common supervision.
In addition to the above statutory criteria, the Board has
consistently held, in accordance with other jurisdictions, that
such factors as qualifications, job function, compensation,
hours of work, fringe benefits, integration of work function,
and interchange between employees are relevant in determining
community of interest. As
6	
As
	stated
	in
	Monterey
	Peninsula
Community
	College
	District, 	Id.:
. . community of interest is not
determined by going down a check list of
these factors. The point of the comparison
is to reveal the interests of the employees
and ascertain whether they share a
substantial mutual interest in matters
subject to meeting and negotiation.
(Citation omitted. ) The interests of
included employees must be mutual not
distinct, and substantial not tenuous.
Thus, employees may be excluded from a
particular unit either because their
interests are separate and apart from those
6	
6Hartnell Community College District (1/2/79) PERB
Decision No. 81; Monterey Peninsula Community College District
(10/16/78) PERB Decision No. 76. 	See also Kalamazoo Paper Box
Corp. (1962) 136 NLRB 134 [49 LRRM 1715].
6

of
	the
	employees
	in
	that
	particular 	unit,(citation
	omitted)
	or
	because
	their
	interest
in
	negotiable 	matters
	subject
	to
	the
	control
of 	the
	employer
	is
	so
	insubstantial 	that
they
	do
	not
	share
	mutual
	interests
	wih
	other
unit
	employees.
	(PERB
	Decision
	No. 	76
	at
p.
	13.)
UC
	has
	designated
	several
	job
	classifications
	in 	the
systemwide
	service
	employees
	unit
	which
	it
	claims
	are 	designed
exclusively
	for
	employees
	who
	have 	a
	casual
	employment
relationship
	with 	the
	university.
Classification
Sports
	Assistant
Referee/Umpire
Sports
	Event
	Attendant
Assistant
	Rescue
	Worker
Parking
	Assistant
Head
	Usher
Senior
	Usher
Usher
House Manager
	II
House 	Manager 	I
Assistant
	House 	Manager
Airport 	Service
	Helper
Driver
Farm
	Laborer
Laboratory Helper
Odd
	Jobber
7
These
	classifications
	are:
Class
	Code
4021
4022
4041
5028
5335
6272
6273
6274
6282
6283
6284
8454
8483
8543
9606
9608
of the employees in that particular unit,
(citation omitted) or because their interest
in negotiable matters subject to the control
of the employer is so insubstantial that
they do not share mutual interests wih other
unit employees. 	(PERB Decision No. 76 at
p. 13.)
UC has designated several job classifications in the
systemwide service employees unit which it claims are designed
exclusively for employees who have a casual employment
relationship with the university. These classifications are:
Classification 	Class Code
Sports Assistant 	4021
Referee/Umpire 	4022
Sports Event Attendant 	4041
Assistant Rescue Worker 	5028
Parking Assistant 	5335
Head Usher 	6272
Senior Usher 	6273
Usher 	6274
House Manager II 	6282
House Manager I 	6283
Assistant House Manager 	628 4
Airport Service Helper 	8454
Driver 	848 3
Farm Laborer 	8543
Laboratory Helper 	9606
odd Jobber 	9608
7

UC 	alleges 	that 	many 	of 	these 	classifications 	are 	designed
for 	use 	in 	part 	or 	exclusively 	by 	registered 	students 	of 	the
university. 	Where 	the 	employment 	of 	students 	in 	the
classifications 	listed 	above 	is 	contingent 	upon 	their 	status 	as
students 	of 	the 	university, 	they 	have 	been 	excluded 	by
stipulation. 	See 	Unit 	Determination 	for 	Employees 	of 	the
Regents 	of 	the 	University 	of 	Calitornia 	(8/4/82) 	PERB 	Order 	No.
Ad-114b-H.
UC 	makes 	two 	arguments 	with 	regard 	to 	alleged 	casual
employees. 	It 	first 	contends 	that 	any 	employee 	in 	these
classifications 	who 	does 	not 	qualify 	for 	membership 	in 	one 	of
the 	several 	retirement 	systems 	for 	which 	university 	employees
may 	be 	eligible 	should 	be 	deemed 	casual 	and 	excluded 	from 	the
bargaining 	unit. 	Generally, 	to 	be 	eligible 	for 	membership 	in
these 	systems, 	a 	university 	employee 	must 	work 	more 	than
50 	percent 	time 	and 	have 	an 	appointment 	be 	of 	more 	than 	a
year's 	duration. 	UC 	argues 	that 	only 	employees 	who 	meet 	these
criteria 	for 	retirement 	system 	participation 	have 	sufficient
employment 	interests 	to 	warrant 	their 	inclusion 	in 	the
bargaining 	unit.
UC, 	in 	essence, 	is 	attempting 	to 	define 	a 	point 	at 	which 	an
employee's 	relationship 	with 	the 	university 	is 	transformed 	from
intermittent 	and 	sporadic 	to 	substantial 	and 	continuing. 	UC
contends 	if 	an 	employee 	fails 	to 	satisfy 	the 	qualifications 	for
participation 	in 	its 	retirement 	system, 	the 	status 	of 	that
person 	is 	per 	se 	casual.
8
UC alleges that many of these classifications are designed
for use in part or exclusively by registered students of the
university. 	Where the employment of students in the
classifications listed above is contingent upon their status as
students of the university, they have been excluded by
stipulation. See Unit Determination for Employees of the
Regents of the University of California (8/4/82) PERB Order No.
Ad-114b-H.
UC makes two arguments with regard to alleged casual
employees. It first contends that any employee in these
classifications who does not qualify for membership in one of
the several retirement systems for which university employees
may be eligible should be deemed casual and excluded from the
bargaining unit. Generally, to be eligible for membership in
these systems, a university employee must work more than
50 percent time and have an appointment be of more than a
year's duration. UC argues that only employees who meet these
criteria for retirement system participation have sufficient
employment interests to warrant their inclusion in the
bargaining unit.
UC, in essence, is attempting to define a point at which an
employee's relationship with the university is transformed from
intermittent and sporadic to substantial and continuing. UC
contends if an employee fails to satisfy the qualifications for
participation in its retirement system, the status of that
person is per se casual.

The
	Board
	has
	specifically
	rejected
	such
	an
	approach~
	In
Dixie
	Elementary School
	District
	(8/11/81)
	PERB
	Decision
No.
	171,
	the
	Board
	modified
	an
	existing 	unit
	of
	regular
full-time, 	substitute
	and
	temporary
	teachers
	by
	including
certain
	unrepresented 	day-to-day
	substitutes
	and
	temporary
teachers.
	The
	Board
	noted
	that
	there
	was:
The Board has specifically rejected such an approach. 	In
Dixie Elementary School District (8/11/81) PERB Decision
No. 171, the Board modified an existing unit of regular
full-time, substitute and temporary teachers by including
certain unrepresented day-to-day substitutes and temporary
teachers. 	The Board noted that there was:
•.•
	no
	indication 	that
	the
[petitioned-for] 	teachers'
	interest
	and
commitment
	to,
	or
	empathy
	with,
	the
	concerns.
of
	others
	within
	the 	bargaining
	unit, 	is
proportional
	to
	their
	number-of-days-
employment. 	Moreover,
	to
	impose 	a
	threshold
requirement 	for
	inclusion
	in
	the
	unit
	based
on
	number-of-days-employment
	would
	be
inevitably
	arbitrary
	[footnote
	omitted].
There
	is
	no
	rationale 	instructing
	where
	the
line 	establishing
	the
	minimum
	should
	be
drawn.
	Accordingly,
	this
	Board
	does 	not
require,
	as
	a
	condition 	of
	unit
	membership,
that
	a
	classroom
	teacher
	work
	for
	a
specified
	number
	of
	days.
	(PERB
	Decision
No.
	171,
	at
	pp.
	7-~.)7
Additionally,
	the
	Board 	has
	rejected
	the
	argument
	that 	less
than
	50
	percent 	part-time
	employment
	alone 	should
	automatically
result
	in 	the
	casual 	designation 	of
	an
	employee. 	See 	Belmont
Elementary 	School
	District, 	Id.,
	EERB
	Decision
	No. 	7;
	Paramount
Unified
	School
	District
	(10/7/77)
	EERB
	Decision
	No.
	33.
7
Prior 	to 	January 	1, 	1978,
	PERB
	was 	known
	as 	the 	Educational
Employment
	Relations
	Board 	(EERB).
9
Temporary 	employees 	were
	also
	included 	in
	a
	bargaining
unit
	of 	teachers 	in
	Belmont
	Elementary 	School
	District
(12/30/76)
	EERB
	Decision
	No.
	7, 	based
	on
	similar
	working
conditions
	and 	employment
	as
	part
	of 	the
	regular 	faculty 	pool.
. no indication that the
[petitioned-for] teachers' interest and
commitment to, or empathy with, the concerns
of others within the bargaining unit, is
proportional to their number-of-days-
employment. Moreover, to impose a threshold
requirement for inclusion in the unit based
on number-of-days-employment would be
inevitably arbitrary [footnote omitted].
There is no rationale instructing where the
line establishing the minimum should be
drawn. Accordingly, this Board does not
require, as a condition of unit membership,
that a classroom teacher work for a
specified number of days. 	(PERB Decision
No. 171, at pp. 7-8.)7
Additionally, the Board has rejected the argument that less
than 50 percent part-time employment alone should automatically
result in the casual designation of an employee. See Belmont
Elementary School District, Id. , EERB Decision No. 7; Paramount
Unified School District (10/7/77) EERB Decision No. 33.
7Temporary employees were also included in a bargaining
unit of teachers in Belmont Elementary School District
(12/30/76) EERB Decision No. 7, based on similar working
conditions and employment as part of the regular faculty pool.
Prior to January 1, 1978, PERB was known as the Educational
Employment Relations Board (EERB) .

The 	mere
	fact
	that
	an
	employee
	does
	not
	work 	a
	sufficient
number
	of
	days
	or 	percent 	of
	time
	to
	qualify
	for
	participation
in
	a
	university
	retirement
	system
	does
	not,
	in
	and
	of
	itself,
indicate 	that
	the
	employee
	does
	not
	share
	a 	community
	of
interest
	with
	other 	unit
	members. 	The
	record
	reveals
	that
	the
claimed
	casual
	employees
	may
	perform
	duties 	similar 	to
	those
	of
other 	unit
	employees;
	receive
	the
	same
	rates
	of
	pay;
	have
	the
same
	qualifications,
	skills
	and
education;
	work
	the
	same
shifts;
	report 	to
	the
	same
	supervisors;
	and
	receive
	roughly
equivalent
	benefits.
	Absent
	evidence
	to
	the
	contrary, 	there
	is
no
	reason 	to 	believe 	that
	such
	an 	employee
	does
	not
	share
	a
substantial co~unity
	of
	interest
	with
	other
	unit
	employees.
Ineligibility
	to
	participate
	in
	one
	of 	the
	university
retirement
	systems
	is
	not,
	by
	itself,
	enough
	to
	persuade 	us
differently.
UC
	secondly 	argues
	that
	if
	the
	Board 	does
	not 	adopt
	the
retirement
	system
	eligibility 	criterion,
	the
	individuals 	in
	the
classifications
	claimed 	as
	casual
	should
	be
	excluded
	from
	the
service 	unit
	because 	they
	lack
	a
	sufficient
	community
	of
interest
	with
	other 	unit
	employees
	and 	do
	not
	have 	a
	reasonable
expectation 	of 	continuing 	regular
	employment.
UC
	cites
	many
	instances 	in
	which 	employees
	in 	disputed
classifications
	are
	employed
	exclusively
	on 	a
	per-event 	or
per-game
	basis.
	UC
	contends
	that 	these
	employees 	have
	only
	a
sporadic, 	intermittent 	relationship
	with 	the 	university 	and,
10
The mere fact that an employee does not work a sufficient
number of days or percent of time to qualify for participation
in a university retirement system does not, in and of itself,
indicate that the employee does not share a community of
interest with other unit members. The record reveals that the
claimed casual employees may perform duties similar to those of
other unit employees; receive the same rates of pay; have the
same qualifications, skills and "education; work the same
shifts; report to the same supervisors; and receive roughly
equivalent benefits. Absent evidence to the contrary, there is
no reason to believe that such an employee does not share a
substantial community of interest with other unit employees.
Ineligibility to participate in one of the university
retirement systems is not, by itself, enough to persuade us
differently.
UC secondly argues that if the Board does not adopt the
retirement system eligibility criterion, the individuals in the
classifications claimed as casual should be excluded from the
service unit because they lack a sufficient community of
interest with other unit employees and do not have a reasonable
expectation of continuing regular employment.
UC cites many instances in which employees in disputed
classifications are employed exclusively on a per-event or
per-game basis. UC contends that these employees have only a
sporadic, intermittent relationship with the university and,
10

therefore,
	lack
	a
	sufficient
	community
	of
	interest
	with
	other
service
	employees
	to
	warrant
	their
	inclusion
	in
	the
	unit.
Referee/Umpire 	(Class
	Code 	4022)
To
	the
	extent
	discussed
	below
	the
	Board
	agrees 	with
	UC's
contentions.
	For
	instance,
	employees
	in
	the
	referee/umpire
classification
	are
	employed
	to
	work
	as
	officials 	at
	intramural
athletic
	events. 	Typically,
	they
	are
	employed
	throughout
	an
intramural
	season, 	but
	may 	work
	as
	little
	as
	one 	game.
	They
are
	paid 	only 	for 	the
	time
	they
	spend
	officiating.
	There
	is
	no
indication 	that
	they
	have 	any
	regular 	contact
	with
	other
	unit
employees,
	share
	any
	of
	the
	same
	concerns 	over
	working
conditions,
	or
	have 	any
	of 	the
	same
	career 	expectations.
Sports
	Event
	Attendant
	(Class
	Code 	4041)
The 	same
	is
	true
	for
	incumbents
	in 	the
	sports
	event
attendant
	classification.
	These 	employees
	sell
	and
	collect
tickets
	during
	intercollegiate 	athletic
	events.
	Throughout 	the
year
	they
	are
	eligible
	to
	work
	at
	approximately
	five
	or
	six
home
	football
	games, 	12
	to
	15
	basketball
	games 	and
	six
gymnastic
	events.
	Employees
	in
	this 	classification
	generally
do
	not
	work
	every 	event
	and 	have 	no
	guarantee 	of
	being
	called
to
	work 	a 	minimum 	number
	of 	times.
	When
	asked
	to
	work
	an
event,
	an
	individual 	is
	employed 	and
	paid 	for 	approximately 	six
hours.
11
therefore, lack a sufficient community of interest with other
service employees to warrant their inclusion in the unit.
Referee/Umpire (Class Code 4022)
To the extent discussed below the Board agrees with UC's
contentions. For instance, employees in the referee/umpire
classification are employed to work as officials at intramural
athletic events. Typically, they are employed throughout an
intramural season, but may work as little as one game. 	They
are paid only for the time they spend officiating. 	There is no
indication that they have any regular contact with other unit
employees, share any of the same concerns over working
conditions, or have any of the same career expectations.
Sports Event Attendant (Class Code 4041)
The same is true for incumbents in the sports event
attendant classification. These employees sell and collect
tickets during intercollegiate athletic events. Throughout the
year they are eligible to work at approximately five or six
home football games, 12 to 15 basketball games and six
gymnastic events. Employees in this classification generally
do not work every event and have no guarantee of being called
to work a minimum number of times. When asked to work an
event, an individual is employed and paid for approximately six
hours.
11

Head
	Usher
	(Class
	Code
	6272),
	Senior
	Usher
	(Class
	Code
	6273)
and
	Usher
	(Class
	Code 	6274)
Incumbents
	in 	the
	head
	usher, 	senior
	usher,
	and
	usher
classifications
	are
	employed 	on
	the
	same
	event-by-event
	basis.
At
	such
	events,
	ushers 	take
	tickets
	and
	guide
	members
	of
	the
audience 	to
	their 	seats.
	They
	are
	employed
	only
	when
	events
attracting
	audiences
	to
	university
	facilities
	occur.
	The
record
	reveals,
	at 	least 	at
	the
	UC
	Berkeley
	campus,
	that
	ushers
are
	not 	guaranteed
	a 	minimum 	number
	of
	hours 	per
	week, 	and
	in
fact
	average
	less
	than 	four 	hours 	per
	week.
House 	Manager
	II
	(Class
	Code
	6282),
	House 	Manager 	I
	(Class
	Code
6283) 	and
	Assistant
	House 	Manager
	(Class
	Code 	6284)
Finally,
	employees
	in
	the
	house
	manager
	II,
	house
manager
	I,
	and
	assistant
	house
	manager
	classifications
experience 	the
	same
	type
	of 	periodic
	employment.
	Incumbents
	in
each
	classification
	are 	involved
	in 	the
	direction
	of
	the 	house
staff
	for
	a
	public
	event 	or 	performance
	in-a 	university
facility.
	While 	house 	managers
	are 	invested 	with
	a
	great 	deal
of
	responsibility,
	they
	are
	employed
	only
	on
	an
	individual,
	per
event
	basis.
	The
	record
	indicates 	that
	the
	positions
	in 	the
house
	manager
	series
	are
	explicitly
	distinguished
	from
so-called
	auditorium
	managers 	by
	the
	fact 	that
	they
	have
	only
per-event 	duties
	as 	opposed
	to 	continual, 	overall 	departmental
responsibilities.
12
Head Usher (Class Code 6272) , Senior Usher (Class Code 6273)
and Usher (Class Code 6274)
Incumbents in the head usher, senior usher, and usher
classifications are employed on the same event-by-event basis.
At such events, ushers take tickets and guide members of the
audience to their seats. They are employed only when events
attracting audiences to university facilities occur. 	The
record reveals, at least at the UC Berkeley campus, that ushers
are not guaranteed a minimum number of hours per week, and in
fact average less than four hours per week.
House Manager II (Class Code 6282) , House Manager I (Class Code
6283) and Assistant House Manager (Class Code 6284)
Finally, employees in the house manager II, house
manager I, and assistant house manager classifications
experience the same type of periodic employment. Incumbents in
each classification are involved in the direction of the house
staff for a public event or performance in a university
facility. While house managers are invested with a great deal
of responsibility, they are employed only on an individual, per
event basis. The record indicates that the positions in the
house manager series are explicitly distinguished from
so-called auditorium managers by the fact that they have only
per-event duties as opposed to continual, overall departmental
responsibilities.
12

The 	common
	thread 	for
	employees
	in
	all
	of 	the
classifications
	mentioned
	above
	is
	that
	their
	employment
	is
sporadic
	at
	best,
	and
	their
	hours
	of
	work,
	when
	employed,
	are
extremely
	limited. 	Further,
	it
	appears
	that
	employees
	in
	these
classifications
	generally
	have
	no
	regular 	contact
	with
	other
unit
	members
	and, 	undoubtedly,
	do
	not 	look
	at
	their
	jobs
	with
the
	same
	career 	expectations.
	Moreover,
	there
	is
	no
	indication
that
	these
	employees
	possess
	any
	of
	the
	same
	qualifications,
training
	or
	skills
	of 	other 	service 	unit
	employees.
	Since
these
	employees
	lack
	both
	a
	continuing
	relationship
	and 	common
interest
	with
	other 	unit
	members,
	we
	exclude 	the
classifications
	discussed
	above
	as
	casual.
Sports 	Assistant
	(Class
	Code 	4021)
On
	the
	other
	hand,
	the 	record
	discloses 	that
	employees
	in
	a
number
	of
	other 	contested
	classifications
	work 	on 	a
	relatively
consistent 	basis
	with
	other
	unit
	members, 	and
	in
	fact
	do
	share
mutual
	interests
	in 	matters 	subject
	to
	negotiations.
	For
instance,
	those
	in
	the
	sports
	assistant 	classification 	instruct
and/or
	coach
	at
	intramural
	athletic
	events
	and
	perform
	many
other 	duties 	associated
	with 	the
	university's 	physical
education 	programs.
	Specifically, 	sports 	assistants
	may
	be
asked 	to 	organize
	and
	direct 	practice 	sessions,
	assist
	in
conducting 	sports
	workshops,
	plan 	class
	equipment 	needs,
instruct 	participants
	on
	rules
	and
	procedures,
	collect 	fees,
sell
	sports 	merchandise, 	maintain 	security
	and
	substitute 	for
13
The common thread for employees in all of the
classifications mentioned above is that their employment is
sporadic at best, and their hours of work, when employed, are
extremely limited. Further, it appears that employees in these
classifications generally have no regular contact with other
unit members and, undoubtedly, do not look at their jobs with
the same career expectations. 	Moreover, there is no indication
that these employees possess any of the same qualifications,
training or skills of other service unit employees. Since
these employees lack both a continuing relationship and common
interest with other unit members, we exclude the
classifications discussed above as casual.
Sports Assistant (Class Code 4021)
On the other hand, the record discloses that employees in a
number of other contested classifications work on a relatively
consistent basis with other unit members, and in fact do share
mutual interests in matters subject to negotiations. For
instance, those in the sports assistant classification instruct
and/or coach at intramural athletic events and perform many
other duties associated with the university's physical
education programs. Specifically, sports assistants may be
asked to organize and direct practice sessions, assist in
conducting sports workshops, plan class equipment needs,
instruct participants on rules and procedures, collect fees,
sell sports merchandise, maintain security and substitute for
13

referees
	or
	lifeguards
	as
	required.
	Although
	the 	record
	is
silent
	as 	whether
	these
	employees
	work
	full-time,
	they
	are
employed
	throughout
	an
	intramural
	season
	and 	may
	continue
	in
such
	employment
	past
	the
	end
	of
	the
	sports
	season.
	There
	is
	no
concrete
	evidence
	that
	such
	employment
	is
	limited
	and
sporadic.
	Sports
	assistants
	indeed
	work
	under
	the
	same
conditions,
	with 	the
	same
	supervision
	and 	same
	hours 	as
	other
unit
	members. 	The 	mere
	fact 	that 	their
	employment
	does
	"not
necessarily
	continue"
	from 	one
	intramural
	season
	to
	the
	next
	is
not
	enough
	to
	convince
	us
	that
	these
	employees
	are
	casual.
Thus, 	the
	sports
	assistant 	classification 	is
	included 	in 	the
unit.
Assistant
	Rescue
	Worker
	(Class-Code
	5028)
Also
	in
	dispute 	are
	employees
	in 	the
	assistant
	rescue
worker
	classification.
	These 	employees
	perform 	rescue
	and
paramedical
	services 	primarily
	on
	the 	beaches
	at
	or
	near
	the
	UC
Santa
	Barbara
	campus.
	In 	addition
	to
	alleging 	that
	these
employees	
work	
only
	part-time,
	UC
	further
	claims
	that
	many
assistant
	rescue
	workers
	serve 	only 	as
	substitutes
	for 	regular
full-time
	rescue 	workers.
	As
	for 	the
	first
	contention,
	UC
fails
	to 	specify 	the 	exact
	number
	of 	hours 	per
	week 	an
individual
	works. 	Absent 	evidence
	that 	"part-time"
	employment
equates 	to
	work 	which
	is 	clearly 	sporadic
	and
	intermittent,
	we
do 	not 	find 	these
	employees
	to
	be
	casual.
	As
	for 	the 	second
contention 	that
	some
	assistant
	rescue 	workers 	serve 	only 	as
14
referees or lifeguards as required. Although the record is
silent as whether these employees work full-time, they are
employed throughout an intramural season and may continue in
such employment past the end of the sports season. 	There is no
concrete evidence that such employment is limited and
sporadic. 	Sports assistants indeed work under the same
conditions, with the same supervision and same hours as other
unit members. 	The mere fact that their employment does "not
necessarily continue" from one intramural season to the next is
not enough to convince us that these employees are casual.
Thus, the sports assistant classification is included in the
unit.
Assistant Rescue Worker (Class Code 5028)
Also in dispute are employees in the assistant rescue
worker classification. These employees perform rescue and
paramedical services primarily on the beaches at or near the UC
Santa Barbara campus. In addition to alleging that these
employees work only part-time, UC further claims that many
assistant rescue workers serve only as substitutes for regular
full-time rescue workers. As for the first contention, UC
fails to specify the exact number of hours per week an
individual works. Absent evidence that "part-time" employment
equates to work which is clearly sporadic and intermittent, we
do not find these employees to be casual. As for the second
contention that some assistant rescue workers serve only as
14

substitutes,
	we
	do
	not
	think
	this,
	in
	and
	of
	itself,
	is
sufficient
	to
	warrant
	their
	exclusion
	from
	the
	unit
	as
	casual.
Assistant
	rescue
	workers
	have
	the
	same
	supervision
	and
qualifications,
	use
	the
	same
	equipment,
	work
	under
	the
	same
conditions,
	and
	shoulder 	the
	same
	degree 	of
	responsibility
	to
the 	public
	as
	other
	unit
	members.
	Thus,
	they 	share
	many
	mutual
interests
	in
	working
	conditions
	with
	other
	unit
	members
	and,
therefore,
	the
	assistant
	rescue
	worker
	classification 	is
included 	in 	the
	unit.
Parking
	Assistant
	(Class
	Code 	5335)
We
	reach 	the
	same
	conclusion
	with
	regard
	to
	employees
	in
the
	parking
	assistant 	classification.
	While
	parking
	assistants
are
	employed
	primarily 	to
	assist
	with 	the
	direction
	and
handling 	of
	heavy
	automobile
	traffic
	during
	campus
	events
	which
draw
	a
	large
	number
	of
	vehicles,
	the 	record
	also 	discloses 	that
these
	employees
	share 	in 	the 	day-to-day 	operation
	and
	control
of 	university
	parking
	lots
	and
	structures.
	They 	work
	under 	the
same
	conditions
	and
	supervision,
	with 	the
	same
	health
	and
safety
	concerns 	as 	other 	unit
	members.
	There
	is
	nothing 	in 	the
record 	to 	support 	the 	conclusion
	that 	this
	work
	is
intermittent,
	sporadic 	or 	temporary. 	Thus,
	parking
	assistants
share
	a
	sufficient
	community
	of
	interest
	with 	other 	service
employees 	and
	the
	classification 	is
	included 	in 	the
	unit.
15
substitutes, we do not think this, in and of itself, is
sufficient to warrant their exclusion from the unit as casual.
Assistant rescue workers have the same supervision and
qualifications, use the same equipment, work under the same
conditions, and shoulder the same degree of responsibility to
the public as other unit members. 	Thus, they share many mutual
interests in working conditions with other unit members and,
therefore, the assistant rescue worker classification is
included in the unit.
Parking Assistant (Class Code 5335)
We reach the same conclusion with regard to employees in
the parking assistant classification. While parking assistants
are employed primarily to assist with the direction and
handling of heavy automobile traffic during campus events which
draw a large number of vehicles, the record also discloses that
these employees share in the day-to-day operation and control
of university parking lots and structures. They work under the
same conditions and supervision, with the same health and
safety concerns as other unit members. There is nothing in the
record to support the conclusion that this work is
intermittent, sporadic or temporary. 	Thus, parking assistants
share a sufficient community of interest with other service
employees and the classification is included in the unit.
15

Airport
	Service
	Helper 	(Class
	Code
	8454)
With
	regard
	to
	the
	classification
	of
	airport
	service
helper,
	the 	record
	indicates
	only
	that
	employees
	in
	this
classification
	average
	approximately 	four 	hours
	of
	work
	per
week 	and 	do
	not
	have
	continuity
	of
	employment.
	Absent
	specific
facts
	showing
	sporadic
	and
	intermittent
	employment,
	the
	Board
cannot
	conclude
	that
	these
	employees
	lack
	a
	sufficient
community
	of
	interest
	with
	other 	unit
	employees.
	Therefore,
	we
include
	them
	in 	the
	unit.
Driver
	(Class
	Code 	8483)
UC
	additionally
	contends
	that
	employees
	classified
	as
drivers
	should
	be
	excluded 	as
	casual.
	It
	presented
	facts
indicating
	only
	that
	these
	employees
	work
	part-time
	and
	have
	no
expectation
	of 	continued
	employment.
The
	driver 	class
	is
	intended 	for
	use
	by
	those
	who
	operate
standard
	UC
	automobiles 	in 	the
	transport
	of 	passengers
	or
supplies.
	Nothing
	in 	the 	record
	indicates 	that 	drivers
	do
	not
share
	a 	community
	of
	interest
	with
	other 	unit
	employees. 	There
are
	no
	facts
	showing
	that 	drivers
	do
	not
	have
	continuing
employment. 	Absent 	such
	evidence,
	we
	reject
	the 	claim
	that
these
	employees
	are 	casual
	and
	include 	the
	driver
classification
	in 	the
	unit.
16
Airport Service Helper (Class Code 8454)
With regard to the classification of airport service
helper, the record indicates only that employees in this
classification average approximately four hours of work per
week and do not have continuity of employment. Absent specific
facts showing sporadic and intermittent employment, the Board
cannot conclude that these employees lack a sufficient
community of interest with other unit employees. Therefore, we
include them in the unit.
Driver (Class Code 8483)
UC additionally contends that employees classified as
drivers should be excluded as casual. It presented facts
indicating only that these employees work part-time and have no
expectation of continued employment.
The driver class is intended for use by those who operate
standard UC automobiles in the transport of passengers or
supplies. Nothing in the record indicates that drivers do not
share a community of interest with other unit employees. 	There
are no facts showing that drivers do not have continuing
employment . 	Absent such evidence, we reject the claim that
these employees are casual and include the driver
classification in the unit.
16

Farm
	Laborer 	(Class
	Code 	8543)
The
	claim
	that
	those
	in 	the
	farm
	laborer
	classification
	are
casual
	is
	also
	without
	merit.
	Farm
	laborers
	perform
	basic
agricultural
	tasks
	at
	farm
	sites
	operated
	by
	the
	university.
UC's
	evidence
	indicates 	that
	these
	employees
	often
	work
	on.a
seasonal 	basis
	and 	have 	no
	expectation 	of 	continuing
	employment
with
	the
	university.
	While
	there
	is
	little
	doubt
	that
	farm
work
	is
	seasonal
	and
	that
	farm
	laborers
	may,
	in
	some
	cases,
	be
laid
	off
	after
	planting
	or
	harvest 	periods,
	we
	cannot 	conclude
that
	these
	employees
	have 	no
	expectation 	of 	continuing
employment.
	The
	record
	is
	silent
	as
	to 	the 	percentage
	of
	farm
laborers
	who
	are
	actually 	laid 	off,
	the 	percentage
	who
	are
	once
again
	rehired,
	or 	the
	duration
	of
	their
	employment 	when
	hired
to
	perform
	seasonal
	work.
	Absent
	this
	information,
	UC
	has
failed
	to
	establish 	that
	these
	employees
	lack 	reasonable
expection 	of 	continuing
	employment
	with 	the
	university.
	What
is
	clear
	from
	the 	record
	is 	that
	farm
	laborers 	are
	in
	direct
contact
	with
	other 	unit
	members, 	work 	under
	the
	same
conditions,
	perform
	essentially
	the
	same
	tasks,
	have
	the
	same
supervision,
	and
	are 	subject 	to 	the
	same 	working
	hours. 	Thus,
there 	is
	no
	reason 	to 	believe 	that
	farm
	laborers 	lack
	a
significant 	interest
	in 	bargaining 	matters 	of 	importance
	to
other 	unit
	members. 	The 	farm
	laborer 	classification 	therefore
is
	included 	in 	the 	unit.
17
Farm Laborer (Class Code 8543)
The claim that those in the farm laborer classification are
casual is also without merit. Farm laborers perform basic
agricultural tasks at farm sites operated by the university.
UC's evidence indicates that these employees often work on a
seasonal basis and have no expectation of continuing employment
with the university. While there is little doubt that farm
work is seasonal and that farm laborers may, in some cases, be
laid off after planting or harvest periods, we cannot conclude
that these employees have no expectation of continuing
employment. The record is silent as to the percentage of farm
laborers who are actually laid off, the percentage who are once
again rehired, or the duration of their employment when hired
to perform seasonal work. Absent this information, UC has
failed to establish that these employees lack reasonable
expection of continuing employment with the university. 	What
is clear from the record is that farm laborers are in direct
contact with other unit members, work under the same
conditions, perform essentially the same tasks, have the same
supervision, and are subject to the same working hours. 	Thus ,
there is no reason to believe that farm laborers lack a
significant interest in bargaining matters of importance to
other unit members. The farm laborer classification therefore
is included in the unit.
17

Laboratory
	Helper 	(Class
	Code 	9606)
The 	same
	conclusion
	is
	reached 	with
	regard
	to
	employees
	in
the 	laboratory
	helper
	classification.
	UC's
	evidence
	shows
	only
that
	the
	laboratory
	helper
	position
	is
	one 	which
	is
	generally
used
	for
	part-time
	employment,
	and
	that
	the
	position
	may
	only
be
	for 	the
	duration
	of
	a
	particular
	research
	project.
	The
record
	reveals
	that
	laboratory 	helpers
	work
	under
	the
	same
conditions
	as
	other
	unit
	members, 	have
	generally
	the
	same
qualifications,
	have
	the
	same
	supervision
	and
	perform
	similar
tasks.
	There
	are
	no
	specific 	facts
	showing
	that
	these
employees
	do
	not
	have
	a
	reasonable
	expectation
	of
	continuing
employment
	and 	do
	not 	share 	the
	same
	concerns 	as
	other
	unit
members
	over
	matters 	of
	employment.
	Therefore,
	the
	laboratory
helper
	classification 	is
	included 	in 	the
	unit.
Odd
	Jobber 	(Class
	Code 	9608)
Finally,
	UC
	contends
	that
	employees
	in 	the
	odd
	jobber
classification
	should
	be
	excluded 	as
	casual.
	Odd
	jobbers
perform 	miscellaneous 	unskilled
	maintenance
	and
	cleaning 	tasks
around 	the
	university.
	Nothing 	in 	the 	record 	convinces 	us
	that
these
	employees
	do
	not 	share 	with 	other 	unit
	members 	an
interest
	in 	bargaining 	issues.
	Evidence 	presented
	by
	UC
	that
incumbents
	in 	the
	odd
	jobber
	positions
	work
	less
	than
	full-time
and
	for
	a
	limited 	duration 	is
	not
	sufficiently 	specific 	to
establish 	that 	these
	employees
	are 	casual. 	Therefore,
	we
conclude 	that 	the 	odd
	jobber
	classification 	is 	included 	in 	the
unit. 
18
Laboratory Helper (Class Code 9606)
The same conclusion is reached with regard to employees in
the laboratory helper classification. UC's evidence shows only
that the laboratory helper position is one which is generally
used for part-time employment, and that the position may only
be for the duration of a particular research project. The
record reveals that laboratory helpers work under the same
conditions as other unit members, have generally the same
qualifications, have the same supervision and perform similar
tasks. 	There are no specific facts showing that these
employees do not have a reasonable expectation of continuing
employment and do not share the same concerns as other unit
members over matters of employment. Therefore, the laboratory
helper classification is included in the unit.
Odd Jobber (Class Code 9608)
Finally, UC contends that employees in the odd jobber
classification should be excluded as casual. Odd jobbers
perform miscellaneous unskilled maintenance and cleaning tasks
around the university. Nothing in the record convinces us that
these employees do not share with other unit members an
interest in bargaining issues. Evidence presented by UC that
incumbents in the odd jobber positions work less than full-time
and for a limited duration is not sufficiently specific to
establish that these employees are casual. 	Therefore , we
conclude that the odd jobber classification is included in the
unit.
18

ORWR
Upon
	the 	foregoing 	Decision
	and
	the
	entire
	record
	in
	this
case,
	the 	Public
	Employment
	Relations
	Board
	ORDERS
	that:
(1) 	The
	classifications 	listed
	in
	Appendix
	A
are
	excluded
from
	the
	Systemwide
	Service
	Unit 	according
	to
	the
	stipulation
of
	the
	parties
	and
	based
	upon
	the
	factual
	record 	in
	this
proceeding.
(2) 	The
	positions
	occupied
	by
	the
	employees
	listed
	in
Appendix
	Bare
	excluded
	from
	the
	unit
	according
	to
	the
stipulation
	of
	the
	parties
	and
	based
	upon
	the
	factual
	record 	in
this
	proceeding.
(3)
	In
	accordance 	with 	the
	stipulation
	of
	the
	parties,
each
	employee
	organization
	may
	identify 	certain
	disputed
employees
	who
	shall
	vote 	challengeq
	ballots
	in
	any
representation 	election
	if
	the
	parties
	are
	unable
	to 	agree
whether 	they 	should
	be
	included 	in 	or
	excluded
	from
	the
	unit.
(4) 	The
	following
	classifications
	are 	casual
	and
	are
excluded
	from
	the
	unit 	for
	the 	reasons
	stated
	in 	the 	foregoing
Decision:
Classification
Referee/Umpire
Sports 	Event Attendant
Head 	Usher
19
Class
	Code
4022
4041
6272
ORDER
Upon the foregoing Decision and the entire record in this
case, the Public Employment Relations Board ORDERS that:
(1) The classifications listed in Appendix A are excluded
from the Systemwide Service Unit according to the stipulation
of the parties and based upon the factual record in this
proceeding .
(2) The positions occupied by the employees listed in
Appendix B are excluded from the unit according to the
stipulation of the parties and based upon the factual record in
this proceeding.
(3) 	In accordance with the stipulation of the parties,
each employee organization may identify certain disputed
employees who shall vote challenged ballots in any
representation election if the parties are unable to agree
whether they should be included in or excluded from the unit.
(4) The following classifications are casual and are
excluded from the unit for the reasons stated in the foregoing
Decision:
Classification 	Class Code
Referee/Umpire 	4022
Sports Event Attendant 	4041
Head Usher 	6272
19

Classification
	Class
	Code
Senior
	Usher	
6273
Usher	
6274
House 	Manager	
II
	6282
House Manager 	I
	6283
Assistant
	House 	Manager	
6284
-	(5) 	The
	following
	classifications
	are
	not
	casual
	and
	are
included 	in 	the
	unit
	for 	the 	reasons
	stated
	in 	the 	foregoing
Decision:
Classification
Sports
	Assistant
Assistant
	Rescue
	Worker
Parking
	Assistant
Airport 	Service
	Helper
Driver
Farm
	Laborer
Laboratory 	Helper
Odd
	Jobber
Class
	Code
4021
5028
5335
8454
8483
8543
9606
9608
(5)
	Any
	technical 	errors
	in
	this
	Order
	shall
	be
	presented
to
	the
	director 	of 	representation
	who
	shall
	take 	appropriate
action
	thereon 	in 	accordance 	with
	this
	Decision.
By 	the	
BOARD
20
Classification 	Class Code
Senior Usher 	5273
Usher 	6274
House Manager II 	6282
House Manager I 	6283
Assistant House Manager 	6284
(5) The following classifications are not casual and are
included in the unit for the reasons stated in the foregoing
Decision:
Classification 	Class Code
Sports Assistant 	4021
Assistant Rescue Worker 	5028
Parking Assistant 	5335
Airport Service Helper 	8454
Driver 	848 3
Farm Laborer 	8543
Laboratory Helper 	9606
Odd Jobber 	9608
(5) Any technical errors in this Order shall be presented
to the director of representation who shall take appropriate
action thereon in accordance with this Decision.
By the BOARD
20

Title
Code
630.4
.745.
3
4821
5112
5166
5450
5451
5501
5521
8082
8085
8095
8131
8247
8552
9552
APPENDIX
	A
CLASSIFICATIONS
	TO
	BE
	EXCLUDED
	FROM
UNIT
	11
	BY
	STIPULATION
Job
	Title
Custodian
	Supervisor
Lead
	Truck
	Driver
Mail
	Service 	Supervisor
Custodian 	Supervisor
Senior 	Light
	Fixture
	Attendant
Principal
	Food
	Service 	Supervisor
Senior
	Food
	Service 	Supervisor
Principal
	Baker
Principal
	Cook
Tree
	Trirrnner
	Supervisor
Pest
	Control 	Supervisor
Physical 	Plant
	Laborer/Gardener 	Supervisor
Grounds
	Supervisor
Physical 	Plant 	Operator 	Supervisor
Supervising
	Truck
	Driver
Botanical
	Garden/Arboretum
Manager
APPENDIX A
CLASSIFICATIONS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM
UNIT 11 BY STIPULATION
Title
Code 	Job Title
630.4 	Custodian Supervisor
745.3 	Lead Truck Driver
4821 	Mail Service Supervisor
5112 	Custodian Supervisor
5166 	Senior Light Fixture Attendant
5450 	Principal Food Service Supervisor
5451 	Senior Food Service Supervisor
5501 	Principal Baker
5521 	Principal Cook
8082 	Tree Trimmer Supervisor
8085 	Pest Control Supervisor
8095 	Physical Plant Laborer/Gardener Supervisor
8131 	Grounds Supervisor
8247 	Physical Plant Operator Supervisor
8552 	Supervising Truck Driver
9552 	Botanical Garden/Arboretum Manager

APPENDIX
B
f	
03/0B/B3	
EMPLOYEES
IN
POSITIONS
TO
BE
EXCLUDED
FROlf
UNIT
11
BY
STIPULATION	
PAGE
	t
CODE
	UNIT
	NAIIE
	TITLE
Mr'\IIE
	CAMPUS
	REASONS	
( '	
·---
--------·--
·-
	----· ----···-
1
	0'.i6t',.3	
ll	
NICHOLS,
	CHARL.ES
G,
	MATERIAL HAIWLER
3
	l.BL
	SUP
	J[,3:·;
('	
:~	
1
lB22	
DOWNING, ,HiMES
E,
	SR MAIL
PROCESSOR
	UC[I
	8UP	
u,
1u
1
1fl22
	FERGUBUN,
	iiLPfWNSO
	SR
MAIL
PROCESSOR
	UCL.A
	SUP
	"jlJJO
If 	1
1822	
GONZALEZ,
	G,
	SR MAIL
PROCESSOR
	LICSF
	SUP
	16:3'1
(	
,_,
	1
1B22
	l1
	1-IAUGABOOK
,	
f":iNN 	SR
MAIL
PROCESSOR 	IJCSF 	SUP
	16
1H)
1+822 	1 l	
HENM1)N, 	[1ARBARA
ELLEN
	SR
MAIL PROCESSOR
	UCD
	SUP
	:1.61414
C
7 	11.022
	l1
	HILL,
	BETTY
..I
•	
SR
MAIL
PROCESSOR
	UCD
	sur
	lb'l6
1
1822
	ll
	.JAMES,
	.JERRY
	SR
MAIL PROCESSOR
	UCLA
	SUP
1
HJ22	
l<METZ,	
LO
I~;
	SR
MAIL
PROCESSOR 	UCI 	SUP
	16~i3
10
	4822
	l1
	MANNING,
	RONt1Lll
c.	
SR
MAIL
PROCESSOR
	UCLA
	SUP
	l b 14 7
(
	1.1
	IHJ22	
MOORE,
	R.
	SR
HAIL
PROCESSOR	
llCSF
	SUP
	1.b'l1
12
	1
.f822 	11
	NISHIYAMA,
	s.
	SR MAIL
PROCESSOR 	UCSF
	SUP
	16
1
¾::'
	(
J"'
··-·
	1
Hl22	
J.1	
PETRELLI,
	JEAN
	SR MAIL
PROCESSOR	
UCLA	
SUP
	7 1
+29
( 	l
1+
	'+822	
11 	RELLES,
	,JOEi~ 	SR
MAIL
PROCESSOR
	UCLA
	SUP
	74:H
15 	4B22
	l1
	RIVETTE,
	PAUL.
R. 	SR
MAIL
PROCESSOR
	tJC[I
	SUP	
ll,
1+5
16
	llf:1~~2	
11	
SCHWANl<E, 	SHERRY
J.
	SR MAIL PROCESSOR	
IJCI 	SIJP
	t6'.3'.;'
(
	l7	
'.'i062 	11	
ARCfHBAL[I
SR,,	
DAVID
J,
	SR
STOREKEEPER
	IJCB
	SIJP
	J.t,5 1l
'.5062	
1.1	
BARA.JAS, 	JOHN H. 	SR
STOREKEEPER
	UCS[I
	SUP 	1.6711
(
'."i062 	l 1	
BOROWY,
	AL
	SR
STOREKEEPER
	llCI
	SUP
	7 1
437
(	
:rn	
~:i062 	u
	BRYAN, 	R.	
H. 	SR
STOREKEEPER 	lJCSB 	SUP
	16f:ll
;:>:[	
5062	
l1	
BURR,
	NORMAN WAYNE	
SR frfOREKEEPER
	UCLA 	SLIP
	7 11-:D
( 
!:i0 6;! 	11	
CAMPBELL,
	wr~LTER 	SR
SJOREKEEPER
	tJCD
	SIJP
	1.670
I.'	
!:,062	
ll	
CAf'TAIN,
	GWENDOLYN 	SR
STOREKEEPER 	IJCfl
	SUP 	16~)~:_;
~j062
	l1
	COTRELL, CHAPLES 	SR
STOPEl<EEPER 	lJCI	
SLIP	
1683
,..,r.:·	
...
:
....
• 	'.5062
	l1
	DELFAU, 	RONl)lt,ll
	BP ::noHEKEEPER 	UCB 	f,LIP	
1659
26 	5062 	l1
	DUNNING, 	{'tl~THUP
M. 	SI~
!,TOP.El<EEPER	
UC'.,11 	GUP
	ll-7'..·,
27	
!:i062	
ll
	DURnETT, riTEVE 	'3H
'3
IOREKEEPEI~ 	'.';I.IP 	7 1-13B
•
03/08/83
APPENDIX B
EMPLOYEES IN POSITIONS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM UNIT 11 BY STIPULATION 	PAGE
CODE 	UNIT NAME 	TITLE_NAME 	CAMPUS REASONS
1 	0566.3 	11 	NICHOLS, CHARLES G. 	MATERIAL HANDLER 3 	L.BL. 	SUP 	1635
2 	1822	
1.1 	DOWNING, JAMES E 	SR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCD 	SUP 	144:3
3 	1822	
l1 	FERGUSON, ALPHONSO 	SR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCLA 	SUP 	7430
4 	4822	
l1 	GONZALEZ, G. 	SR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCSF 	SUP 	1639
J:;'	
4822 	11 	HAUGABOOK , ANN 	SR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCSF 	SUP 	1640
6 	4025 	1 1 	HENMAN, BARBARA ELLEN 	SR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCD 	SUP 	1644
7 	4822 	11 	HILL, BETTY J. 	SR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCD 	SUP 	1646
8 	1822 	1 1 	JAMES. JERRY 	SR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCLA 	SUP 	1 1
,3;;
9 	1822 	l.1 	KMETZ, LOIS 	SR HAIL PROCESSOR 	UC 	SUP 	1653
10 	4822 	11 	MANNING, RONALD C. 	SR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCLA 	SUP 	1647
1 1 	4827	
l1 	MOORE , R. 	SR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCSF 	SUP 	1641
12 	4822 	11 	NISHIYAMA, S 	BR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCSF 	SUP 	1642
13 	41823 	11 	PETRELLI, JEAN 	SR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCLA 	SUP 	7429
14 	4822 	11 	RELLES, JOEL 	SR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCLA 	SUP 	7431
15 	4822 	11 	RIVETTE, PAUL R. 	SR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCD 	SUP 	1645
16 	4822 	1 1 	SCHWANKE, SHERRY J. 	BR MAIL PROCESSOR 	UCT 	SUP 	1652
17 	5062 	11 	ARCHIBALD SR. , DAVID J. 	BR STOREKEEPER 	UCE 	SUP 	1654
1B 	5062 	1 1 	BARAJAS, JOHN H. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSD 	SUP 	1674
19 	5062 	11 	BOROWY, AL 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCT 	SUP 	7437
20 	5062 	11 	BRYAN, R. H. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSB 	SUP 	1681
21 	5062 	11 	BURR, NORMAN WAYNE 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCLA 	SUP 	7433
22 	5062 	11 	CAMPBELL, WALTER 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	1670
23 	5062 	11 	CAPTAIN, GWENDOLYN 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCP 	SUP 	1655
24 	5062 	11 	COTRELL, CHARLES 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCI 	SUP 	1683
25 	5062 	11 	DELEAU, RONALD 	SP STOREKEEPER 	UCP 	SUP 	1659
26 	5062 	11 	DUNNING, ARTHUR M. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSD 	SUP 	1675
27 	5062 	11 	DURRETT, STEVE 	SR STOREKEEPER 	IJCI 	SUP 	74 38

APPENIJi..K n
t . 	03/08/83 	EMPLOYEES IN POSITIONS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM UNIT 11 BY STIPULATION 	Pf'.'.\GE 	2
CODE 	UNIT 	NAME 	TITLE NAME 	CAMPUS REASONS
t• 	---·------------- 	---·---·-- ·-····-···-·----
;'.B 	5062 	1.1 	FISHER, 	ROBERT [I. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSD 	SUP 	1676
~I 	!:,062 	1l. 	FLANARY, .JAMFS 	SR STOREl<EEPER 	UCLA 	i:;up 	71L3lf
30 	5062 	GIANimm, ALBERT 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSF 	SUP 	1M,l
• 31 	::;01,2 	ll 	Hr'IMBLIN, 	RONALD 	SR STOREl<EEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	[66::'
•· 32 	'.:i062 	ll 	HEIDEtmEICH, MELVIN 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	U,11
3;3 	3062 	HENNEY, EDWIN A. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	[663
.- ~~i062 	l.1 	IIILL, THOMAS M. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCI 	SLIP 	168 1!
C' 	;55 	5062 	11 	HI RAYM1A, 	PAMELA A, 	SR STOREKEEPER 	ucsc 	SUP 	1680
~j062 	l.1 	HUMERICl<HOlJSE, 	CHARLES R. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSD 	SUP 	1677
• 	:n 	5062 	11 	HUMPHREY, 	Pt'\TRICIA A, 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	:l.6/. 1f
• 5062 	l1 	.JIMENEZ, 	ALFRHt 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSD 	SUP 	71L3'.l
39 	~i062 	11 	.JOHNSTON, 	WILLIAM [I. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	161,'.:;
• 	110 	!"i062 	l1 	JUIHEL.., ("
,:,. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCB 	SUP 	lM,O
f 	'+l 	5062 	11 	LAYMAN, .JAMES A. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	ucsn 	SUP 	l67f:l
'.'i06::• 	l :I. 	LIEB, WILLIAM Q. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCI:t 	SUP 	16.',7
f.
5062 	11 	LINGENFELTER, .JUDITH R, 	SR STOREl<EEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	l66B
I' 	'.'i062 	11 	McI:tANIELS, EDWARD L.' 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCLA 	SUP 	7'+3'.'i
'-J.5 	5062 	l1 	McDONALD, STEWART L. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSII 	SUP 	:l.67'1
t." 116 	'.'i06~! 	11 	OAKLEY, K, 	L, 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCI 	SUP 	168'.'i
( 	5062 	11 	STURl<E, w, 	A, 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCB 	SUP 	1.656
l.f8 	!5062 	l.1 	TANAl<A, wr,L TER s. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	sur 	16,'.,9
(
5062 	l1 	HJRRES, 	RALPH 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCLA 	SUP 	l'L~f-
(. 	;:iO 	506~' 	11 	WALl(ER, LYTHROL, A. 	~,R STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SIJP 	167::'
51 	;j062 	1l 	WIHH:, 	.JERRY 	SR SJOl~El<EEPER 	UCD 	1,UP 	:lf,73
l ~)2 	'.5062 	l1 	WILCOX JR., 	TROY "· SR STORrnEEPER 	UCB 	!,UP 	lb5H
( 	5062 	11 	ZAPPALJ1, I< . 	SI~ STOREKEEPER 	tJCSfl 	SUP 	:l.6fl2.
'.'i061.f 	ll. 	BAINES, U1RRIE M, 	sror~El<EEF'ER 	UCSit 	SUP 	7'+ 1+0
•
APPENDIX B
03/08/83 	EMPLOYEES IN POSITIONS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM UNIT 11 BY STIPULATION 	PAGE 	2
CODE 	UNIT NAME 	TITLE NAME 	CAMPUS REASONS
PE 	5062 	11 	FISHER, ROBERT B. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSD 	SUP 	1676
29 	5062 	11 	FLANARY, JAMES 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCLA 	SUP 	74 31
30 	5062 	l.1 	GIANINNO, ALBERT 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSF 	SUP 	1561
31 	5062 	11 	HAMBLIN, RONALD 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	1662
32 	5062 	11 	HEIDENREICH, MELVIN 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	1671
43 	5062 	l1 	HENNEY, EDWIN A. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	1663
~1 1I 	5062 	11 	HILL, THOMAS H. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCI 	SUP 	1634
35 	5062 	1 1 	HIRAYAMA, PAMELA A 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSC 	SUP 	1680
36 	5062 	11 	HUMERICKHOUSE, CHARLES R. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSD 	SUP 	1677
37 	5062 	11 	HUMPHREY, PATRICIA A 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	1664
3B 	5062 	11 	JIMENEZ, ALFRED 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSD 	SUP 	7439
39 	5062 	11 	JOHNSTON, WILLIAM D. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCE 	SUP 	1565
40 	5062 	11 	JUNIEL, S. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCE 	SUP 	1660
41 	5062 	11 	LAYMAN, JAMES A. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSI 	SUP 	1678
LI.~> 	5062 	11 	LIES, WILLIAM G. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	1647
4~~ 	5062 	11 	LINGENFELTER, JUDITH R. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	16683
1.flf 	5062 	11 	MCDANIELS, EDWARD L. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCLA 	SUP 	7435
15 	5062 	1 1 	MCDONALD, STEWART L. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSD 	SUP 	1679
46 	5062 	11 	OAKLEY, K. L. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCI 	SUP 	1685
47 	5062 	11 	STURKE, W. A. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCE 	SUP 	1656
48 	5062 	11 	TANAKA, WALTER S. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	1649
5062	1,9 	11 	TORRES, RALPH 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCLA 	SUP 	7436
50 	5062 	11 	WALKER, LYTHROL A. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCI 	SUP 	1672
51 	5062 	11 	WHITE, JERRY 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	1673
52 	5062 	11 	WILCOX JR. , TROY D. 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCR 	SUP 	1658
~;3. 	5062 	1 	ZAPPALA, K . 	SR STOREKEEPER 	UCSB 	SUP 	1682
~)lf. 	5064 	11 	BAINES, CARRIE M. 	STOREKEEPER 	UCSI 	SUP 	7440

("'
APPENDIX
B
,,.,
	03/08/83	
EMPLOYEES
IN
POSITIONS
TO
BE EXCLUDED
FRO?f
UNIT
11
BY
STIPULATION	
PAGE
	·~
.,
CODE
	UNIT
	NAME
	TITL.E_NAME
	CAMPUS
REASONS
~	
·- --------
t::"'IC~	
d.J
	50(,lj.
	l1
	CORDOVA,
	JAVIER
	STOREl<EEPER
	UCS[I
	SUP
	71J.ll
l
"'
56	
506
1+ 	11 	DILL,	
TOM	
STOREl<EEPER
	UC[I
	SIJP
	1686
57	
506
1+	
l1
	JONE~,,
	DEBORMl
	STOREKEEPER	
sur
	1b87
C)
506
1+ 	K
IHI<
Pf'IIIHCI(, 	BRIGITEE
RUT
	STOREKEEPER
	UCSD
	SUP
	1688
.,,
	,:~
,-.	
...
.t7	
5065
	l1
	VlLLf\NUEVA,
	TED
	UCD
	SUP
	71+1.f.2
60	
5101
	11	
ABBINGTON,
	.JOHN
R.
	SR
CUSTODIAN
LEADER
	UCB
	SUP
	l689
•	
6:1
	!:il13
	l1
	Al.CIJS,
	BILI,
	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSF 	SUP
	U,91
•
62
	'.HL3	
11	
BM11<S, FRtiNI<
L.	
ASST CUSTODIAN
SUP
	UCD
	SUP	
169:-.)
51.1
~,	
11	
BI
1)[1LE,
	CHESTER 	ASST
ClJSTOllIAN
SUP
	IJC[I
	SUP
	7'+'13
• 	6lf.	
51.13 	:l1 	BRISCOE,	
s.	
M.
	ASST·CUSTODIAN
SUP 	UCI 	SIJP 	17?1.J
..
,	
t,~;	
~il.13
	Ji
	BROWN,
	LEE
A. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	UCD
	SUP
	1697
66
	511.:3
	CHANDLER,
	l<ERRY
L.
•
ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	UC[I
	SUP
	:1698
67
	!'il.13
	l1
	CLEMENTS,
	WILLIE 	ASST
CIJSTot1IAN SIJP
	UCLA
	SUP
	·1
1
i.
1
+9
•
5113
	11 	COLLINS,
	THOMAS
w.
	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	UCD
	SUP
	169';>
i,~;	
~il13
	EVANS, 	PAUL.INE
E.
	ASST CUSTO[t!AN SUP
	UCD
	SUP
	1700
•	
70
	5lB
	1l
	FUDGE,
	EUGENE
	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSF 	SUP	
"jl~!:i(")
• 71	
51B	
11	
GOOCH,
	A.
	M.
	ASST
CllSTO[tJAN
SUP
	UCSB
	SUP
	17
l
':';
72
	511:3	
1l
	GRAHAM,
	CLYDE
	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSF 	SUP
	1.692
e
73
	:'il.13 	11	
GRAYDON,	
,J'	
w.
	ASST CUSHJDIAN
SUP 	UCS[t 	SUP
	1716
.,,	
711 	11
	GUER Rr''\,
	M.
	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSB 	SUP	
l
717
7'.:i	
~il13	
1.1	
HARRIS, 	,J.	
A~lST
CUSTODIAN SUP
	llCSit
	SUP	
1
71.
B
t'i'
76 	5113	
11	
HARVEY,
	WILLIE 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSF	
SUP	
71.1.57
p	
77 	5lL3
	l.1
	HENDERSON, 	GLADYS
[I•	
ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	lJC[I
	SUP
	1701
78 	511.3 	u
	flOLLOl,,l~iY, 	JUNE 	/',SST
CUSTODIAN SUP	
UCLA 	SIJP
	'lit
5 0
( )
79
	!"i113
	l1
	ISOME,
	R.
	L. 	ASST CUSTODIAN
~,UP 	UCS[c	
SUP	
1720
BO	
51.L3 	,JACQUES, 	DONhL[I 	hSST CU!,TUDIAN SUP	
.l
70 ')
J :'il.L3
	l1
	JONES, 	MARSflt'.1Ll. s. 	Abf;T CIJSTO!llhN mtP 	t~UP	
1703
•
APPENDIX B
03/08/83 	EMPLOYEES IN POSITIONS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM UNIT 11 BY STIPULATION 	PAGE 	3
A CODE 	UNIT NAME 	TITLE_NAME 	CAMPUS REASONS
55 	5064 	11 	CORDOVA, JAVIER 	STOREKEEPER 	UCSD 	SUP 	7441
56 	5064 	1 1 	DILL, TOM 	STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	1686
57 	5064 	1 1 	JONES, DEBORAH 	STOREKEEPER	
UCD 	SUP 	1687
~,B 	5064 	11 	KIRKPATRICK, BRIGITEE RUT 	STOREKEEPER 	UCSD 	SUP 	1608
59 	5065 	11 	VILLANUEVA, TED	
ASST 	KEEPER	
STOREKEEPER 	UCD 	SUP 	742
50 	5101 	11 	ABBINGTON, JOHN R. 	SR CUSTODIAN LEADER 	UCR 	SUP 	1689
61 	5113 	11 	ALCUS, BILL 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSF 	SUP 	1691
62 	5113 	1 1 	BANKS, FRANK L. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCD 	SUP 	1695
63 	5113 	11 	RIDDLE, CHESTER 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCt 	SUP 	7413
64 	5113 	11 	BRISCOE, S. H. 	ASST - CUSTODIAN 	UCI 	SUP 	1724
65 	5113 	11 	BROWN, LEE A. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCD 	SUP 	1697
66 	5113	
ll 	CHANDLER, KERRY L. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCI 	SUP 	1698
67 	5113 	11 	CLEMENTS, WILLIE 	ASST CUSTODIAN 	UCLA 	SUP 	7449
68 	5113 	1 1 	COLLINS, THOMAS W. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCI 	SUP 	1697
69 	5113	
l.l 	EVANS, PAULINE E. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCI 	SUP 	1700
70 	5113 	11 	FUDGE, EUGENE 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSF 	SUP 	7456
71 	5113 	11 	GOOCH, A. M. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSB 	SUP 	1715
72 	5113 	1 1 	GRAHAM, CLYDE 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSF 	BUP 	1692
73 	5113 	11 	GRAYDON, J. W. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSD 	SUP 	1716
714	
5113 	11 	GUERRA, M. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	JCSR 	SUP 	1717
75 	5113 	11 	HARRIS, J. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSF 	SUP 	1718
76 	5113 	i1 	HARVEY, WILLIE 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSF 	SUP 	7457
77 	5113 	11 	HENDERSON, GLADYS B. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCL 	SUP 	1701
78 	5112 	1 1 	HOLLOWAY, JUNE 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCLA 	SUP 	7450
70 	5113 	11 	ISOME, R. L. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSE 	SUP 	1720
30 	5113	
l1 	JACQUES, DONALD 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCD 	SUP 	170%
Bl 	5113 	11 	JONES, MARSHALL S. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCD 	SUP 	1703

APPENDIX
B.
·•
f	
03/08/83	
EMPLOYEES
IN
POSITIONS
TO
BE
EXCLUDED
FROM UNIT
11
BY
STIPULATION	
Pf'."c1GE
	If
g!;n,~;
	UNIT	
!.:l0U~	
lITLEJlAME
	CAMPUS
REASONS
,.
82
	5l13 	1l
	LEE,
	x.
	ASST CUSTODIAN
SlJP 	lJCI
	SUP
	1723
f'!I	
83 	5113
	1l	
ASST CUSTO[IIAN SUP
	lJCSB
	SIJP
	l12j
'.'il13	
l1
	MARTINEZ,
	FRH•[IJE
	ASST CUSTODIAN
SUP
	lJCD
	1701J.
.,
8!';
	5l,B
	u
	MAS,
	.JESS
	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	IJCLA
	SUP	
7 1
i~;
1
C>	
86	
~ilB	
u
	MATIOS, 	DAVIli
A. 	ASST
CUSlO[tlAN
SUP
	UCD
	SUP	
l70~i
87	
!:ilL3
	11	
Mt1ZYCI<,
	ElHJArW
v.	
ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	UCD
	SUP
	170/,
~
5l13	
ll	
MENDEZ,
	SANTIAGO
(),
	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCI	
1725
••
~'il
13	
11 	METSIK
M.
	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	UCLA
	SUP
	1713
5l13	
l1	
NUNES,
	DWIGHT
	ASST
CUSTODIAN
SUP
	UC[I
	SUP
	1.707
••
	91	
::i1U 	l1	
PAXTON,
	C(1SSIIJS
	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	IJCLA
	SUP	
"l4
~:i
::.~
• 51.13 	u 	PIAN,Wll.IA, 	SHIRLEY
M.	
ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	ucsc
	SUP
	l 71 1.f
5113	
11	
PINCKNEY,
	TYRONE
	ASST CIJSTO[I
I
AN
SUP
	UC[I
	SUP	
1700
•	
5l13
	u 	RAIDEL,
	CHARLOTTE
	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	UCLA
	SUP	
7lf5]
• 9!:i
	;:il U
	ll
	RICHARDSON,	
EVERETT	
ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	UCD
	SUP
96
	5l.13
	l1
	ROIHNSON,
	I<
•
	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	UCSB
	SUP
	71J.1.f6
~
51L5
	l1
	ROMERO, 	MARGRET
G,
	ASST CUSTODIAN
'SUP
	UCI 	SUP
	1726
,..
	'..'il13 	u
	SAMELIEW, CONSTANTINE 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP	
llCD 	SUP
99 	51L3	
11	
SANDERS,
	DONETHA
	ASST·CIJSTODIAN SIJP
	UCD
	SUP
	l709
-·
100
	!"il.13 	11 	SANDERS,
	RUBY
	ASST CllSTOIHAN SUP
	UCLA
	SUP
	-n11.1n
C.>	
101	
~i1L5	
11	
SMHIERS,
	WOODROW
	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP
	UCLA
	SUP	
/lflf
7
102 	5113
	11 	SfHELDt,, 	JOSEPH 	ASST
CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSF
	169
11
lJ
103 	5113	
11	
THURLEY,
	RUSH
	ASST CUSTODIAtl SUP	
IJCSF 	SUP	
7·1-1,5~;
()
	l Olf 	'.5113
	TURNER, 	JERRY A. 	ASST CUSTOIHAN SUP
	UCD
	SIJP
	1710
lO'.:; 	511:3
	ll	
IJNGLES,
	ROGER
E.
	A!3ST
CUSTODIAN SUP 	IJC[I 	SUP 	1711
' ,
106 	!:il13 	l1
	VERTIZ, GUILLERMO 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	SIJP 	/IJ.~ilf
107 	5113 	1l
	WHITE,
	M.
	C. 	tlSf)T CUSTODI{,N SUP 	UCf:>B 	SUP 	172:?
~
lOB
	51.B	
ll	
lHLSf!N, MILJ:!RE[1 	AS\31
	cu~;
IOOIAN ~;ur 	UCD 	~,UP 	l
71
;:>
•
03/08/83
APPENDIX B
PAGE	EMPLOYEES IN POSITIONS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM UNIT 11 BY STIPULATION
CODE 	UNIT NAME 	TITLE _NAME 	CAMPUS REASONS
82 	5113 	11 	LEE, X. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCI 	SUP 	1723
87 	5113 	11 LO LOPEZ,
	M.	
s.	PEZ, M. S. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSB 	SUP 	1721
Bl~ 	5113 	1 1 	MARTINEZ, FREDDIE 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCT	
SUP 	1704
85 	5113 	11 	HAS, JESS 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCLA 	SUP 	7451
96 	51 13 	1 1 	MATTOS, DAVID A. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCD 	SUP 	1705
87 	5113 	11 	MAZYCK , EDWARD V. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCD 	SUP 	1706
BB 	5113 	11 	MENDEZ, SANTIAGO O. 	T CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCT	
SUP 	1725
89 	5113 	11 	METSIK H 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCLA 	SUP 	1713
9" 	5113 	11 	NUNES, DWIGHT 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCI 	SUP 	1707
21 	5113 	11 	PAXTON, CASSIUS 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCLA 	SUP 	7452
S'') 	5113 	11 	PIANAVILIA, SHIRLEY M. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSC 	SUP 	1714
93 	5113 	11 	PINCKNEY, TYRONE 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCI 	SUP 	1708
9ll 	5113 	11 	RAIDEL, CHARLOTTE 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCLA 	SUP 	7453
95 	5113 	11 	RICHARDSON, EVERETT 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCD 	SUP	
71flj
1.f
96 	5113 	11 	ROBINSON, K . 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSE 	SUP 	74 46
'l7 	5113 	11 	ROMERO, MARGRET G 	ASST CUSTODIAN 'SUP 	UCI 	SUP 	1726
98 	5113 	11 	SAHELIEW, CONSTANTINE 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCD 	SUP	
71.J.l.1'.'i
99 	5113 	11 	SANDERS, DONE THA 	ASST . CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCD 	SUP 	1705
100 	5113 	11 	SANDERS, RUBY 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCLA 	SUP 	7448
101 	5113 	11 	SANDERS, WOODROW 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCLA 	SUP 	74 47
102 	5113 	11 	SHIELDS, JOSEPH 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSF 	SUP 	1694
103 	5113 	1 1 	THURLEY, RUSH 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSF 	SUP 	7455
104 	15412 	11 	TURNER, JERRY A. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCD 	SUP 	1710
105 	5113 	11 	UNGLES, ROGER E. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCD 	SUP 	1711
106 	5113 	11 	VERTIZ, GUILLERMO 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP	
UCI 	SUP 	7454
107 	5113 	11 	WHITE, M. C. 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCSB 	SUP 	1722
108 	5113 	11 	WILSON, MILDRED 	ASST CUSTODIAN SUP 	UCD 	SUP 	1712

03/08/83
APPENDIX B
EMPLOYEES IN POSITIONS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM UNIT 11 BY STIPULATION 	PAGE
CODE 	UNIT NAME 	TITLE NAME 	CAMPUS REASONS
109 	5116 	11 	ROBINSON, CLEMON 	SR CUSTODIAN 	UCLA 	SUP 	7458
1 10 	5333 	11 	DAVIS, L. A. 	SR PARKING REP 	UCI 	SUP 	1732
111 	5334 	11 	CARLTON, MARGARET A. 	PARKING REP 	UCD 	SUP 	1733
112 	5334 	11 	SPERLING, SHARON 	PARKING REP 	UCLA 	SUP 	7459
113 	54 45 	1 1 	ANTLES, J. E. 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCSB 	SUP 	1740
114 	5445 	11 	BARSON, THELMA S. 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCK 	SUP 	1735
115 	5445 	1 1 	CHIAPPONE, J. E. 	ASST FOOD SER MOR 	UCSF 	SUP 	1741
116 	5445 	CROW, AL 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCLA 	SUP
117 	5445 	11 	DOVER, G 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCSR 	SLIP 	7467
118 	5445 	11 	HERZOG, CATHY 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCLA 	SUP 	7464
119 	5445 	11 	JACKSON, E. L. 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCSF 	SUP 	1742
120 	5445 	11 	JONES, M. 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCSB 	SUP 	7468
121 	5445 	11 	KITAY, ROBERT J. 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCLA 	SUP 	1736
122 	5445 	11 	MANERA, C. 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCLA 	SUP 	7460
127 	5445 	11 	MURRAY, DUDLEY 	ASST FOOD SER MOR 	UCLA 	SUP 	71452
124 	5445 	11 	NAK ITIN, LEON 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCSO 	SUP 	6979
125 	5445 	11 	OSBORNE , ANN 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCLA 	SLIP 	7465
126 	5445 	11 	REYNOLDS, R. 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCSB 	SUP 	7469
127 	5445 	11 	TERRY, LINDA K . 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCR 	SUP 	1738
128 	5445 	11 	WALKER, SARAH E. 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCSD 	SUP 	739
129 	5445 	11 	WEBBER, ROGER 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCR 	SUP 	7461
130 	5445 	11 	WHITE, F 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCSR 	SUP 	7466
131 	5922 	1 	HAWKINS, CURTIS 	SR COOK 	UCR 	SUP 	1 743
132 	5522 	11 	JOHNSON, JAMES 	SR COOK 	UCH 	SUP 	7472
137 	5522 	11 	PETERS, LOIS F. 	SR COOK 	UCD 	SUP 	1747
134 	5522 	11 	PILLER, MAGDALENA T. 	SR COOK 	UCE 	SUP 	1746
135 	5522 	11 	RHODES, GEORGE A. 	SR COOK 	UCP 	SUP 	74 73
• APPENDIX B
... 	03/0P/03 	EMPLOYEES IN POSITIONS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM UNIT 11 BY STIPULATION 	Pi\HE 	",_,
CODE 	UNIT 	NAME 	TITLE NAME 	CAMPUS REr1~,0NS	---.--•-·---·----·--.. ___	
l,r-
1.09 	'.'il.16 	ll 	ROBIN[WN, 	CLEMON 	BR CUSTO[IJAN 	UCLA 	SUP 	-,·11-,.rn
... 	110 	i,;c,;-r•,; 	ll 	l:ttNIS, L. 	A. 	SR Pr'H{I< ING REP 	lJCI 	SUP 	17:3;•
1 l1 	533 11- 	l.l 	CARLTON, Mr'\RGARET A, 	PARl<ING REP 	lJCit 	SUP 	1733
- 	U.2 	:_;33 1-1- 	11 	SPERLING, SfMRON 	PARKING REP 	UCLA 	SUP 	7'+ ~~?
- 113 	:=;;1.pi5 	l1 	ANTLES, 	J, F 	ASST FOOfl SER MGR 	llCf,B 	SUP 	l 7 1-1-0
l lit 	5lfll '.i 	l.l 	B(IRSON, 	THELMA s. 	ASST FOO[I SER MGR 	UCB 	SUP 	1 ~; :~ ~--;
~ t l ;.'; 	~-)'-~ l~ ::; 	l1 	CHIAPPONE, 	J, [. 	ASST FOOi) SER MGR 	UCSB 	SUP 	17'1 l
.. 	116 	5I-fll-5 	11 	CROW, 	riL 	fiSST FOOD SER MGR 	UCLA 	SUP 	74 .t,:-~
117 	::;,.,. t~!5 	l1 	DOVE fl, 	(3, 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCSB 	SUP 	7'+l~ 7
"' 	1 l8 	5t4t1.5 	ll 	HERZOG, CATHY 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCLA 	SUP 	"j!J-6I-1
• ll.9 	!:.tt~4 ~._; 	l1 	JACl(SON, E. 	L. 	1iSST FOOD SER MGR 	UCSB 	SUP 	1 i''12
1 ;!o 	~;1.1. 1+5 	11 	JONES, M • 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCSB 	SUP 	71+60
.. Ul 	'.',l+lf5 	l1 	KITAY, 	ROBERT J. 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCLA 	SUP 	1736
.. 	122 	51.,.1.,.5 	11 	MANERA, c . 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCLA 	SUP 	7460
1.23 	~jl+lf ~) 	11 	MURRAY, 	DUDLEY 	ASST FOOD SER MOR 	UCLA 	SUP 	7462
.. 12 1-1- 	51.,..... 5 	11 	NAK ITIN, 	LEON 	ASST FOOU SER MGR 	ucsc 	SUP 	697?
• 125 	:51+11-5 	11 	DSBORNE, r~NN 	ASST FOOi) SER MGR 	UCLA 	SUP 	711-6'.';
126 	5lflf-5 	11 	REYNOLUS, 	R. 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	UCSB 	SUP 	74,6?
• 	l::'7 	;:jlj.lf5 	11 	TERRY, LINDA I( • 	ASST FOOIJ SER MGR 	UCR 	SUP 	173B
• 128 	~jlf. l.J. ~) 	11 	WAL,l<E R, 	BARAH E. 	ASST F()IJ[I SER MGR 	llCSD 	SUP 	l ·,:,?
12';> 	~:jl.J-lJ.5 	11 	1,JEB[lFR, 	ROGER 	ASST FOOD SER MGR 	lJCR 	SUP 	7 1+61	,, 130 	5 1.J-4-~5 	11 	WHITE, F. 	ASSl FOOD SER MGR 	UCSB 	SUP 	"/lff,6
fP 	131 	~:;~:;22 	11 	HAWKINS, CURTIS 	SR COOi< · 	UCB 	SUP 	l 71+~~
132 	')t::;?~1 	11 	JOHNSON, 	..JAMES 	Sf{ CDOK 	UCB 	SUP 	747:-'
(•
13:~ 	~_:;~; ;?,:~ 	1.1. 	PETERS, 	LOIS F. 	SR COOi< -' 	IJCD 	SUP 	l7I17
t- 	131+ 	~-:;~;22 	11 	PILLER, 	Mr'.'1GDAL.ENA T. 	SR COOi( 	UCB 	SUP 	1.7'+6
135 	r::·c-.,,,1	
J,..,,._.:. 	ll 	HHODE G, 	GEORIJE r). 	GR CODI< 	UC[l 	~,UP 	7'+73
•

APPENDIX B
03/08/83 	EMPLOYEES IN POSITIONS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM UNIT 11 BY STIPULATION 	PAGE
CODE 	UNIT NAME 	TITLE_NAME 	CAMPUS REASONS
136 	5522 	11 	RUTLEDGE, LINTON 	SR COOK 	UCLA 	SUP 	750
137 	5650 	11 	COLLINS, ALFREDA A. 	PRIN FOOD SER WKR 	UCSD 	SUP 	74 74
138 	5650 	HUEY, JOSEPH B. 	PRIN FOOD SER WKR 	UCD 	SUP 	1753
139 	5650 	11 	MITCHELL, PEGGY 	PRIN FOOD SER WKR 	UCI 	SUP 	1754
140 	5651 	11 	BRUNO, MOLLIE A. 	SR FOOD SER UKR 	UCD 	SUP 	1757
141 	5651 	11 	CORDOVA, JAVIER 	SR FOOD SER WKR 	UCSD 	SUP 	7366
142 	5651 	1 1 	JOVEZ, A 	SR FOOD SER UKR 	UCSF 	SUP 	1756
143 	5651 	SCHELEN, ROBERT 	SR FOOD SER WKR 	UCD 	SUP 	7475
144 	5652 	11 	WILSON, MARY 	FOOD SER 	UCSF 	SUP 	7476
145 	5821 	11 	SCHUMACHER, ALICE 	SR HEAD LINEN SER UKR 	UCD 	SUP 	1761
146 	6772 	1 1 	HILES, ARDATH L. 	BR LIBRARY BOOKMENDER 	UCB 	SUP 	7551
147 	8148 	11 	ABEL, L. E. 'BUD' 	SR FARM MAINTENANCE WKR 	UCP 	SUP 	7477
C
148 	8148 	11 	LEECH, HARVEY 	SR FARM MAINTENANCE UKR 	ucn 	SUP 	1764
149 	8211 	1 1 	HOBSON, ROBERT 	BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUP 	UCI 	SUP 	1956
150 	8211 	1 1 	KEIL, GERALD R. 	BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUP 	UCD 	SUP 	1950
151 	8211 	11 	STIGAR, DONALD 	BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUP 	UCI 	SUP 	1957
152 	821 	11 	WHITE, H. H. 	BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUP 	UCB 	SUP 	7487
153 	8212 	FASSLER, MELVIN L. 	SR BUILDING MAINTENANCE WKR 	UCD 	SUP 	1958
154 	8195 	SCOTT, STAN 	PRIN AUTO EQUIPMENT OPER 	UCSC 	SUP 	1768
155 	8540 	11 	BOWLES, DANNY O. 	PRIN AGRICULTURECH 	UCR 	SUP 	74 78
156 	8540 	11 	FALCO, NUNCIO 	PRIN AGRICULTUREH 	UCR 	SUP 	7479
157 	8540 	11 	ORTEGA, THOMAS 	PRIN AGRICULTIECH 	UCR 	SUP 	7430
150 	8540 	11 	RAMIREZ, HENRY S. 	PRIN AGRICULTUREH 	UCR 	SUP 	1771
159 	8540 	11 	TORRES, ROBERT VASQUEZ 	PRIN AGRICULTIECH 	UCR 	SUP 	1772
ThSB
160 	f:15lf j_ 	11 	WADDELL, DELBERT E. 	SR AGRICULTURECH 	UCR 	SUP 	1773
r· -~
APP1'.1u.JIX B
{' 	03/08/83 	EMPLOYEES IN POSITIONS TO BE EXCLUDED FROM UNIT 11 BY STIPULATION 	P,'oGE 	I,
CODE 	UNIT 	NAME 	TITLE_NAME 	g£i!J!''l§ REASONS
(' 	·-- --·-----~----·-
136 	~)52:~ 	l1 	RUTl.,EJIGE, 	LINTON 	SR COOK 	UCLA 	SUP 	1750
("I 	137 	!'i650 	CIJI..LINS, t'.\LFREllA A. 	PRIN FOOD SER Wl<R 	UCS[I 	St.IP 	7474
1.38 	~it,~fO 	l1 	HUEY, 	JOSEPH B. 	PRIN FOOD SER IJK R 	lJC [I 	SUP 	17'."i3
('
139 	5b~;() 	l1 	MITCHELL, 	PEGGY 	PRIN FOOD SER WK R 	UC[I 	SUP 	l 75lf.
("' 	ll10 	5651 	l1 	BRUNO, MOLLIE A, 	SR FOO[I SER IJK R 	UCD 	SUP 	17~;7
1 111 	5651. 	11 	CORDOV,~, ,JAVIER 	SR FOOD SER WKR 	UCS[I 	SUP 	7366
<' 1'12 	5b~5l 	l1 	,JOVEZ, A, 	SR FOOD SER WKR 	UCSF 	SUP 	17~)6
e 	1113 	56~,t 	ll 	SCHELEt~, 	ROBERT 	SR roon SER WKR 	UC[I 	SUP 	7'-f-7!:;
1'-f4 	~i652 	1l 	WIL.!'.lON, 	MARY 	FOOn SER Wl<R 	UCSF 	SUP 	71f 71,
,...
1115 	~'if:121 	11 	SCHUMACHER, 	ALICE 	SR HEAD LINEN SER WKR 	ucn 	SUP 	1761
('• 	:1. 116 	6T?2 	l1 	HILES, 	AR[IATH L, 	SR LIBRARY BOOK MENDER 	UCB 	SUP 	7~;5.1.
1 lf 7 	81'18 	11 	ABEL., L.E. 	'[IIJ[I' 	SR FARM MAINTENANCE Wl<R 	UCD 	SUP 	7477
c·, 1'+8 	8Prn 	l1 	LEECH, HARVEY 	SR FARM MAINTENANCE: WKR 	UCD 	SUP 	l 7bl~
(.' 	l't9 	8211 	11 	HOBSON, 	ROBERT 	BUH.DING MAINTENANCE SUP 	UCI 	SUP 	1956
1.50 	(1211. 	11 	KEIL, 	GERALD R.
(. 	1DUILDING MAINTENANCE SllP 	UCD 	SUP 	1950
151 	B211 	11 	STIGAR, 	DONALD 	BU IL.DING MAINTENANCE SIJP 	UCI 	SUP 	1957
0 	:1. 5:~ 	8211 	u 	WHITE, H. H. 	BUIL.JHNG Mf'\INTENAUCE SllP 	UCB 	SUP 	71Hl7
153 	8212 	11 	FASSLER, MELVIN L. 	SR BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1-ll(R 	lJC[I 	SUP 	1950
( .,
15 1·1· 	f:l'+B~i 	l l 	SCOTT, STAN 	f'RIN AllTO EQIJIPMENT OPER 	ucsc 	SUP 	.176H
(" 	155 	f:15I+0 	11 	BOWLES, 	DANNY o. 	PRIN AGRICIJLT TECH 	UCR 	SUP 	{lliB
156 	fl'..ilfO 	l l 	FAL.CO, NUNCIO 	PRIN AGRICllLT TECH 	llCR 	SUP 	71+19
(}
157 	8~'.IJ.O 	11 	ORTEGA, 	THOMAS 	PRIN AGRICULT TECH 	UCR 	SUP 	71ff!O
(J 	158 	B~itrn 	l1 	RAMIREZ, HENRY s. 	PRIN f;GRICUI..T TECH 	UCR 	SIJP 	1771
159 	85lf0 	1.1 	TORRES, 	ROBEIH vt1!,QUEZ 	PRIN AGRICULT TECH 	LICR 	SUP 	177?
()
160 	l1 	WADDELL, 	DELBERT E. 	SR AGRICULT TECH 	IJCR 	SUP 	nn
(__,
J •