Bobby Cox Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State of Arkansas

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 396
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION III
No. CV-21-300

Opinion Delivered October 5, 2022
BOBBY COX BAIL BONDS, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY
APPELLANT CIRCUIT COURT,
SEVENTH DIVISION
V. [NO. 60CR-18-101]

STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE BARRY A. SIMS, JUDGE

APPELLEE AFFIRMED

MIKE MURPHY, Judge

Appellant Bobby Cox Bail Bonds, Inc., appeals from the April 5, 2021 bond-forfeiture

judgment of the Pulaski County Circuit Court. On November 11, 2017, appellant wrote a surety

bond for David Martinez. Subsequently, Martinez failed to appear for a May 14 omnibus hearing. On

appeal, appellant argues that the circuit court erred in granting bond-forfeiture judgment against it

because appellant did not receive notice of a bond hearing. We affirm.

The instant appeal concerns the bond-forfeiture proceedings as related to case number 60CR-

18-830. The facts, issues raised on appeal, and arguments are identical to those presented in First

Arkansas Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State, 2022 Ark. App. 397, ___ S.W.3d ___, which we also hand down

today. Therefore, we deem it unnecessary to restate them here, and we adopt and incorporate herein

by reference the reasoning set forth in the aforementioned companion case. Accordingly, we affirm

the $10,000 bond-forfeiture judgment entered against appellant.
Affirmed.

VAUGHT and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Wankum Law Firm, by: J. Jeff Wankum, for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Christopher R. Warthen, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2