CourtListener 10608096•Clyde E. Wallace v. State of Arkansas
Full text
Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 537
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION III
No. CR-20-241
Opinion Delivered: December 2, 2020
CLYDE E. WALLACE
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND
V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. 26CR-17-539]
STATE OF ARKANSAS
APPELLEE
HONORABLE JOHN HOMER
WRIGHT, JUDGE
DISMISSED
RITA W. GRUBER, Chief Judge
Clyde Wallace pleaded guilty in the Garland County Circuit Court to second-degree
sexual assault, and an order of judgment was entered on February 1, 2018, convicting him
thereon and sentencing him to twenty years’ imprisonment. No appeal was taken from that
order. On January 31, 2020, Wallace filed a pro se motion to withdraw his plea and vacate
his sentence. On February 3, 2020, the circuit court denied Wallace’s motion. Wallace filed
a timely appeal, which we dismiss.
Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 26.1(a) provides that a “plea of guilty . . . may
not be withdrawn under this rule after entry of judgment.” Ark. R. Crim. P. 26.1(a) (2019).
If the defendant is in custody, a motion to withdraw a plea filed after entry of judgment will
be treated as a postconviction motion under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37. Mims
v. State, 360 Ark. 96, 97, 199 S.W.3d 681, 682 (2004); see also Hall v. State, 2009 Ark. 347
(holding that when a sentence has been entered and placed in execution prior to the filing
of a motion to withdraw the guilty plea upon which it was based, the motion must be treated
as having been made pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1). If a conviction
was obtained on a plea of guilty, a postconviction petition under Rule 37 must be filed in
the appropriate circuit court within ninety days of the date of entry of judgment. Ark. R.
Crim. P. 37.2(c) (2019).
The petition in this case was filed almost two years after judgment was entered. The
time limits imposed by Rule 37 are jurisdictional in nature; if they are not met, a circuit
court lacks jurisdiction to consider the petition. Shaw v. State, 363 Ark. 156, 157, 211 S.W.3d
506, 508 (2005). If the circuit court is without jurisdiction to consider a petition, this court
is also without jurisdiction. See, e.g., Stearns v. State, 2019 Ark. App. 486. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal.
Dismissed.
GLADWIN and HARRISON, JJ., agree.
Clyde E. Wallace, pro se appellant.
Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Jacob H. Jones, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.