Christon Houston v. State of Arkansas

CourtListener 10124739ArkctappSep 25, 2024

Full text

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 448
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION I
No. CR-23-288

Opinion Delivered September 25, 2024
CHRISTON HOUSTON
APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE SALINE COUNTY
CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. 63CR-21-802]
V.
HONORABLE KEN CASADY, JUDGE
STATE OF ARKANSAS
REVERSED
APPELLEE

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge

This case is back before us, having previously been remanded to settle and supplement

the record.1 On January 7, 2022, Christon Jace Houston was sentenced to an aggregate of sixty

months’ probation, having pled guilty to third-degree domestic battering and failure to appear.

Houston now appeals the November 10, 2022 Saline County Circuit Court sentencing order

revoking his probation and sentencing him to an aggregate of sixty months in the Arkansas

Division of Correction. On appeal, Houston requests that this court reverse the revocation,

arguing that the circuit court did not enter or approve the conditions of his probation. We

reverse.

1
This is a companion case to another criminal-revocation case, Houston v. State, 2024
Ark. App. 447, ___ S.W.3d ___. On January 24, 2024, we handed down Houston v. State,
2024 Ark. App. 22, and Houston v. State, 2024 Ark. App. 21, in which we remanded to settle
and supplement the record, ordered rebriefing, and denied without prejudice counsel’s
motion to withdraw.
Save for the specific crimes committed, the sentences imposed in the underlying

conviction, and the sentences imposed on revocation—as set forth above—the factual and

procedural history of this case is identical to that set forth in the companion case, Houston v.

State, 2024 Ark. App. 447, ___ S.W.3d ___, which we also hand down today. The issues

raised, arguments made, standard of review, and discussion are also the same. Thus, we find

it unnecessary to restate them herein. See Raino v. State, 2021 Ark. App. 337. Accordingly,

having set forth our reasoning in the companion case, we reverse the revocation herein.

Reversed.

HARRISON, C.J., and THYER, J., agree.

Jones Law Firm, by: F. Parker Jones III, for appellant.

Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: Kent G. Holt, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.