Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 May 2012.#Lorenzo Ciampaglia v Sangita Masawan.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Torre Annunziata — Interpretation of Articles 8 and 12 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1) — Jurisdiction — Jurisdiction of the court having competence to rule on an application for separation as regards any question relating to parental responsibility.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C‑185/12.

ECLI:EU:C:2012:273Eu Chamb 02 CMay 3, 2012

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Torre Annunziata — Interpretation of Articles 8 and 12 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1) — Jurisdiction — Jurisdiction of the court having competence to rule on an application for separation as regards any question relating to parental responsibility.

Operative part

Operative part

The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Torre Annunziata, made by order of 14 March 2012, is manifestly inadmissible.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.